Lindaland
  Astrology 2.0
  Ophiuchus question (Page 5)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 5 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Ophiuchus question
Mystic_Cat
Knowflake

Posts: 272
From: Pluto and Jupiter
Registered: Jan 2014

posted March 18, 2014 08:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mystic_Cat     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The fact at the end of the day is, that even though it does ROUGHLY work with the seasons, it is the constellations that effect humanity, the seasons just summarize them into groups.

You could CALL me a Sagittarius, but in terms of the constellations and what i REALLY and ACCURATELY am, that is incorrect, as WITHIN the seasons and signs, there are DIFFERENT constellations having effect. THEREFORE we can use the constellations to get a DEEPER UNDERSTANDING of astrology.

All the seasons and the Romans creation of "TRADITIONAL" astrology does is create a BARRICADE to stop us realizing it is the CONSTELLATIONS that effect HUMANITY, which is what OPHIUCHUS teaches in the first place.

We'll see as we progress through into the Aquarian age and Aquarian values start coming up.

- We entered the Age of Aquarius on 2012 AD when Regulus entered Virgo.


Sorry for the capitals

IP: Logged

Mystic_Cat
Knowflake

Posts: 272
From: Pluto and Jupiter
Registered: Jan 2014

posted March 18, 2014 08:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mystic_Cat     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It does work through the seasons but the seasons put it into an OUTSIDE PERSPECTIVE and not a real PSYCHOLOGICAL/ASTROLOGICAL UNDERSTANDING

IP: Logged

Mystic_Cat
Knowflake

Posts: 272
From: Pluto and Jupiter
Registered: Jan 2014

posted March 18, 2014 08:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mystic_Cat     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
the Natal does work, but using the Sun signs from the Seasons put it in a very weird, almost inaccurate(To me i guess) perspective, especially for the people born in early December, as they do, concretely, all seem to be Serpentarians

IP: Logged

Mystic_Cat
Knowflake

Posts: 272
From: Pluto and Jupiter
Registered: Jan 2014

posted March 18, 2014 09:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mystic_Cat     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
;

IP: Logged

FireMoon
Knowflake

Posts: 1396
From: Minnesota
Registered: Mar 2012

posted March 18, 2014 09:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for FireMoon     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Mystic_Cat:
Well according to Parke Kunkle only the Sun is large enough to pass through Ophiuchus and be currently given a sign under it (Or they havn't created a 13 sign tropical yet - we'll see in time ) because we are still using the natal, for the Sun signs it is the Natal positions with Serpentarius also pushed in to create the the accuracy of signs - I think for the next age.

It actually says "Get ready for the world to change forever"


I really do think you could be on to something (especially when it comes to future understanding of astrology) but after looking it up there seems to be conflicting information... Like this article for example which says it applies to both Sun and Moon signs, but it wasn't "official" until 2009 which is when all signs should change for ppl born after that...

http://www.examiner.com/article/kunkle-confirms-new-zodiac-sign-ophiuchus

So idk what to think exactly but it's interesting!

Especially since Vedic pushes most planets one sign back and makes the moon most important, and I know a lot of ppl can probably relate to both...

IP: Logged


This topic is 5 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5 

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2014

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a