posted June 23, 2006 01:43 PM            

quote:

---

Zala~ Unfair?
When someone who's seen it calls it "one big burn book"
what am I supposed to assume?

---

Our forum WAS NOT “One Big Burn Book”. But I don’t expect you to believe one of its vile members…..

26T ~

Miss you, girleen!! But as for

quote:

---

Hi Zala! Turn that frown around. I dont think anyone's guilty of anything.

---

posted June 23, 2006 02:35 PM              

LOve and Respect for ALL. .

off to work..

posted June 23, 2006 03:07 PM              

Like you. And Sue G.

Both of you, I see as having very high integrity. I do not see either of you as being mean-spirited, not at all.

posted June 23, 2006 03:13 PM            

...like this for example.

But this is a Performing Right Society website, but you would think that it was something else!

posted June 23, 2006 03:15 PM            

But I feel inclined to.... like it is a duty, vindication.. like innocent parties being involved in a street fight for credibility.

posted June 23, 2006 04:08 PM            

Pixie, I read a large majority of the threads that can`t be Googled. You DID NOT speak mean spirited about anyone in what I read. I did avoid some forums but I sense your consistancy held there.
You didn`t participate in any "people polls" that I read either.

A few souls can ruin it for all.

Hindsight is a wonderful Teacher; may it`s lessons illuminate our tomorrows.

------------------
~
What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world is immortal"~

posted June 23, 2006 04:19 PM              

I agree on what you said about balance. I believe one appreciates the ligther side when one has faced the darker side of the self. You are eright, we all have positive and negative. For some, the darker side may even be a positive.

posted June 23, 2006 04:58 PM              

i believe you too...

posted June 23, 2006 05:51 PM              

And 26Taurus to my knowlege you were never spoken ill of by anyone.

I admit to being upset with Lotus.
But that I will not apologize about because I have said much the same to her here at LL.
She owes me an apology.

And the ones who spoke ill of Pidaua and Tink have confessed.

Some folks rarely posted there and have Nothing to confess or defend. But I will defend them.
Most folks there did not give a hoot about talking about anyone from LL and Never did.
They were simply invited and joined.

Mirandee got some of the worse trashings by the Pidaua trasher yet defended other KS members nobly here.

Lia,Zala,Prox,Aqua, were some of the sweetest and gentlest souls there.

AG worked hard to let everyone do their own thing.
Some were into Art, some into Poetry, some into Photography and crafts.
No where else was I allowed to speak so freely about past lives, lexigrams, religons and philosophy, and gay issues, as I was there.
Thank you AG!

It was nice to be able to disciuss health issues without feeling naked.

Well..
Someone will undoubtedly find some reason to
insult me over this post. But I will not stand by and have anyone insult AG or Pixie or the other very gentle souls who are innocent and were guilty in the eyes of certain LL folks just for being members there.

posted June 23, 2006 06:08 PM            

No one is holding all of KS responsible for the actions of a few. Mirandee, TINK and I weren't the only ones trashed at all. Although Tink's was the worst.

I think there are a few things people are missing.

1) Some do not understand how some KS people stand behind some of the foulest trashers and pretend there was nothing exclusionary about the site.

2) Why is it some can be defended for their brutal words (because it was meant for the person not to see) but when I called someone an old hag - I was worse because everyone could see it?

3) It seems to be okay for the name calling and subsequent defense of those that call names (from certian KS people and some just hanger-ons) as long as it is done to defend the ones we like- but if someone we don't like calls someone a name we can call them a b1tch.

4) The constant deflections of the problem onto something else. For example someone had the nerve to say the reason I was called such brutal names was Karma for posting the initial thread.

Huh.. I wonder what a victim of domestic violence reason is for getting that Karma?

posted June 23, 2006 06:08 PM            

quote:

---

Well..
Someone will undoubtedly find some reason to
insult me over this post. But I will not stand by and have anyone insult AG or Pixie or the other very gentle souls who are innocent and were guilty in the eyes of certain LL folks just for being members there.

---

Insult? No
Disagree? You betcha!

posted June 23, 2006 06:39 PM              

quote:

---

A person could say about me, for instance, that I work at McDonald's, and I might be inclined to correct them, because as a matter of fact I don't work at McDonald's. If that person continues to say that I work at McDonald's I might be inclined to continue to correct that untrue statement, because there's no reasonable point in allowing it to continue to be said. Does this make me sensitive about where I'm employed? I guess it could (is that unreasonable?). However, the core of what is being said (that I'm working at McDonald's) still continues to be untrue, and my correcting it ad nauseum doesn't reflect on me, but rather the person who continues to promote the inaccuracy.--AG

---

sorry AG but this mcdonalds analogy is a non sequitur......
there are certain facts which arent being disputed here....
so i wrote a new mcdonalds analogy that conforms better to what we know.....

*********

its as if you AG, are the manager at a mcdonalds, and you've hired your best friend magus to flip burgers for you.....

im a health inspector who walks in the front door, and stands back watching into the kitchen for no more than 3 minutes, when i see your buddy magus snort back hard and hawk a big loogie onto a tofu burger, wrap it up and put it on the shelf, for the unsuspecting tink to get on her tray......

i step in of course and open the burger to show tink what she got...and as i do i look back and see AG run for his office.....

i walk back only to find AG burning a surveillance tape in his trashcan......

Petron: "why are you burning that?"

AG: "no reason really, we just like to think we have privacy back here"

Petron: "did you see what i found on tinks tofu burger?"

AG: (shocked) "oh my!! i didnt see him do it, so dont blame me!!"

Petron: "well i wasnt blaming you, but it seems suspicious that you would burn that tape....have you ever known magus to do this type of thing before?"

AG: "i told you, i burned that tape just now so that you wouldnt invade the others privacy,....do you have some proof that magus has done this before?? i'd like to see before i answer...."

Petron: "well surly you remember he got fired from his last job for urinating in jwhops coffee..."

AG: "oh yeah that.....but if you knew jwhop, you'd want to urinate in his coffee too!!"

at this point we all walk out to the dining room, where tink is sitting...looking pale and green.....surrounded by various customers and store employees....

magus: "so what?!! my friends thought it was funny....ouch!!"(getting elbowed by the cashier, fayte.m)

magus: "ok ok, im sorry tink, that you found the loogie"

johnny: "really, it was an isolated incident"

fayte.m: "theres nothing i could do....ive warned him many many times about spitting on the customers food......and you know they spit on the food over at randalls place too!! only they do it 7.32% more often"

mirandee: (another customer) "yea and if you eat alot of magus burgers, you dont even notice the odd tang after awhile...."

sueg: "oh yes!! i just love those magus burgers!! even without the bun or the pattie!!"

solane: "mmmmmmmmmmm"

Petron: "ok without the tape, we'll just have to assume it never happened before, and because youre all so full of love and light, i can rest assured it wont happen again......."

AG: "magus, go back and make a #2 combo, on the house for Petron!!"

yayyy, happy ending....who else wants a magus burger??!!

posted June 23, 2006 06:48 PM            

quote:

---

Sound like a man that may not care for an outspoken woman?

---

One look at those who associate with me would prove otherwise.

posted June 23, 2006 06:52 PM            

The "Pawns" crime: For protecting Kindred Spirits!

posted June 23, 2006 06:54 PM            

I beg to differ. That was a damn good analogy. I was cracking up - so true... 'Do you have proof he has done this before"

"well you do know he urinated in jwhops coffee"

'if you knew jwhop you'd do it too"

AND that is actually how they act. The unevolved KS person (or hanger on) says "Well, it's okay if you DON'T like the person DUH.. get a grip... it's SOOOOO different when it happens to one of my LOVE AND LIGHT precious sisters or brothers!.. Oh.. now where can we go to laugh at those stupid little knowflakes and their posts? It's so much fun to pick on them"

LMAO... too funny!!! We've seen it in action here on this thread, the thread before it and several others. Insults / Accusations are thrown at us, we answer, ask more pointed questions to them and NOTHING... SILENCE.... almost like the light was turned on and the cockroaches scurried away.

Then again what do I know? I apparently am the proud owner of the Grand (ga*sh) Canyon... LMAO

~Pidaua

The Ann Coulter, masculine looking, angry b1tch, drag queen - big gas*hed lesbian hick LMAO...

posted June 23, 2006 07:02 PM            

The major problem in your analogy is obvious. I don't manage, or exercise any influence over what Magus does, which makes me equal with anyone here. To suggest otherwise is ridiculous.