|
Author
|
Topic: Synastry Guessing Game
|
amowls* Knowflake Posts: 451 From: richmond va Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 10:04 AM
Can you post the Composite charts? And include the Vertex? I'm curious to see where the Vertex lands in each.IP: Logged |
DD Knowflake Posts: 1212 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 10:32 AM
Lucia,you asked about orbs; well I have some sort of "categorization", when it comes to orbs: 1. 0° - 1° 2. 1° - 3° 3. 3° - 5° 4. 5°- 7° I like to have these categories so I don`t get fooled. I have so often seen people get all excited about their Venus-Mars-trine with 9 degree and Sun-Moon-sextile with 7 degree, completely ignoring the Mars-Uranus-square with 2 degree and the Sun-Saturn-opposition with 1 degree.
The strongest aspects will usually be the tight orbed ones. Yet, even though I generally only really look at orbs up to 3° (with conjunctions: 5°), there are some exceptions, when I definitely would consider slightly wider orbs (up to 6 or 7 degrees). That is when the wideorbed aspect is part of a synastric stellium or configuration. Example: Person A has: Mars on 15 Taurus Person B has: Venus on 18 Taurus and Moon on 20° Taurus In this case I would OF COURSSE also consider As Mars conjunct B`s Moon. IP: Logged |
Lucia23 Knowflake Posts: 914 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 10:32 AM
Vertex aspects in the composite:PAIR 1 (Libra/Leo, never married): Vertex in 8th house Vertex trine Neptune (0), opp Pluto (1), square NN (0) PAIR 2 (Scorpio/Leo, never lovers): Vertex in 7th house Vertex square Moon (4), square NN (0), square Valentine (1) PAIR 3 (Pisces/Leo, married): Vertex in 7th house Vertex square Uranus (0), trine Neptune (0) Pair 4 (Leo/Scorpio, married): Vertex in 6th house Vertex square Saturn (0), opp Uranus (1), square Eros (4), square Lust (3), square Valentine (3), square Union (4), square MC (2) Pair 5 (Cancer/Libra, never married): Vertex in the 8th house Vertex square Saturn (0), Vertex traine Union (0)
IP: Logged |
Lara Knowflake Posts: 1213 From: aspideronmars Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 10:34 AM
Any of the veryex's conjunct DC?How about davison? :d IP: Logged |
Lucia23 Knowflake Posts: 914 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 10:43 AM
DD, I see the point of your orb classification. I think it makes sense to widen orbs for potential DWs, though, even between planets/asteroids. Let's say A has Eros square B's Mars (0)...it would play out a lot differently if B's Eros opposes A's Mars (4) too. Without the DW, B would unambiguously be the Mars person. IP: Logged |
DD Knowflake Posts: 1212 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 10:45 AM
Let me look at those:"PAIR #1 (Libra Man/Leo Woman)--never married His UNION square her SATURN (0)" Did Saturn "spoil" the possible marriage? Also, it seems that it doesn`t matter if Bride or Groom is connected with other asteroids; those don`t seem to be strong enough for a marriage. "PAIR #2 (Scorpio Man/Leo Woman)--never lovers, never married Her GROOM conjunct his ASC (0)" He was the embodiment of a Groom to you, but not the other way round?
"His UNION square her NN (0)" Another square to Union and there wasn`t a relationship / marriage. Could it be that squares to Union put a lot of obstacles in the way to marriage? (Also the squares were to NN and Saturn, both karmic placements, so probably it is not a good idea to have Union squares to fate objects) "PAIR #3 (Pisces Man/Leo Woman)--married His BODA conjunct her UNION (4)" A conjunction with Union, even though a wide on. "His UNION conjunct her SUN (1)" A WOW conjunction with Union. Could it be that conjunctions make it easier to get married or into a relationship, as squares would make it difficult? "Her UNION conjunct his NN (2)" Again Union-conjunct. With a fated object. Me thinks that is good. NO squares to Union, but conjunctions, and they got married. Pattern? "PAIR #4 (Leo Man/Scorpio Woman)--married His BRIEDE conjunct her IC (0)" Can it be that Bride / Groom only work with major players and their complementary piece (Bride-Groom-aspect)?
"His UNION conjunct her SUN (1)" Again- Unon conjunction. "PAIR #5 (Cancer Man/Libra Woman)--never married Her UNION conjunct his NEPTUNE (0)" Union to an outer planet doesn`t seem to be enough glue. "Her BRIEDE conjunct his SN (3)" Maybe SN conjunctions aren`t strong enough with Briede / Groom? "Her UNION opp his VENUS (0)" An aspect to a major player, but opposition.
"His GROOM opp her BRIEDE (3)" A groom-briede aspect, but also opposition. Could it be that in this case the opposition is not allt hat great?= "Her BRIEDE opp his SATURN (2) Her BRIEDE opp his Union (3)" Again, maybe those are just too many oppositions.
"Her GROOM square his SUN (0) His GROOM square her UNION (4)" Her BRIEDE square his AC (0)" Squares don`t seem to really work with these asteroids.
"His VALENTINE square her UNION (1)" Another Union-square
I noticed: 1) the married couples all had an Union conjunction 2) the not married couples all had Union squares 3) Union seems to trump over BRiede-Groom 4) Briede-Groom only seems to work with the major planets and angles (Sun, Moon, Venus, Mars, IC, ASC, NN, maybe Saturn) and as Briede-Groom-aspect, and they don`t like oppositions nor squares
IP: Logged |
DD Knowflake Posts: 1212 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 10:48 AM
Lucia,even though I basically agree with you, I can already see the long line of asteroids lists with DW between asteroids with astronomical orbs. Also another problem is, that if we consider all possible asteroids, everyone will have countless DW`s with everyone. I think we first have to find out what asteroids are significant. So far it seems that Eros, Juno, Amor, (maybe Valentine) and Union are very significant. Surprisingly I haven`t found Psyche to be so prominent in the synastries I investigated. I don`t know why this is though. IP: Logged |
mblover Knowflake Posts: 110 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 10:56 AM
Lucia23, cool thread.Denise, Great analysis. IP: Logged |
Lucia23 Knowflake Posts: 914 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 10:57 AM
Lara, none of the Vertexes are conjunct DC or any angles...I listed ALL Vertex aspects in the composites under 4 degrees.Vertexes in the Davidson, uncorrected(oh my GAWD I've got to stop posting on here and go do some real writing!): PAIR 1 (Libra/Leo, never married): Vertex in 8th, square Eros (3), opp Karma (1) PAIR 2 (Scorpio/Leo, never lovers): Vertex in 8th, square Sun (1), square Juno (0) PAIR 3 (Pisces/Leo, married): Vertex in 7th, square Merc (1), trine Neptune (2), conjunct Union (3) PAIR 4 (Leo/Scorpio, married): Vertex in 7th, opp Mars (3) PAIR 5 (Cancer/Libra, never married): Vertex in 5th, trine Merc (1), conjunct Valentine (0) WOW, well the Davidson Chart guessed the marrieds correctly! Vertex in 7th for the marrieds and only the marrieds.
IP: Logged |
DD Knowflake Posts: 1212 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 11:03 AM
Let`s continue with the game:Four synastries (without asteroids): Which couple has a long term relationship? Which synastry is the strongest: a) regarding attraction b) regarding compatibility? And why? Synastry 1: Sun square SAturn (0) Moon square Moon (2) Mercury square Venus (2) Mercury trine Mars (2) Mercury trine Neptune (2) Mercury trine NN (2) Mercury opposite Pluto (1) Mercury conjunct IC (3) Mercury trine ASC (0) Venus trine Venus (2) Venus opposite Uranus (3) Mars trine Saturn (3) Jupiter trine Uranus (1) Jupiter square Mars (3) Saturn trine Pluto (0) Uranus trine Sun (1) Uranus trine Mercury (2) Neptune trine Jupiter (1) Pluto trine Venus (2) Pluto square Mars (3) Pluto opposite Jupiter (3) Pluto square ASC (0) Pluto square Neptune (2) Pluto square NN (2) SN conjunct Moon (1)
ASC-ruler: A: Neptune B: Jupiter DSC-ruler both: Mercury Synastry 2: Sun trine Mercury (2) Moon trine Pluto (1) Moon conjunct NN (4) Mercury square Venus (3) Mercury opposite Mars (1) Venus trine Sun (4) Venus square Jupiter (1) Mars conjunct Saturn (3) Mars opposite Uranus (4) Mars opposite Pluto (0) Saturn trine Mars (0) Uraus trine Sun (4) Uranus trine Moon (2) Uranus square Neputne (3) Neptune conjunct SN (3) Pluto trine Venus (2) NN trine Mercury (1) NN square NN (1) ASC-ruler: A: Neptune B: Mars DSC-ruler A: Mercury B: Venus Synastry 3: Sun conjunct Sun (4) Sun conjunct Mercury (5) Moon trine Sun (2) Moon trine Mercury (3) MOon opposite Uranus (3) Mercury conjunct NN (5) Venus conjunct Venus (4) Venus square Pluto (1) Mars square Venus (3) Mars conjunct Pluto (0) Mars trine DSC (2) Jupiter trine Mars (3) Jupiter square Uranus (2) Saturn square Sun (3) SAturn square Mercury (2) Uranus square Sun (1) Uranus square Mercury (1) NN square Moon (2) ASC-r-uler A: Mars B: Jupiter DSC-ruler A: Venus B: Mercury Synastry 4: Sun conjunct Venus (1) Sun square Pluto (1) Sun square MC (2) Moon conjunct Uranus (3) Mercury conjunct Sun 85) Mercury conjunct Mercury (5) Venus square Jupiter (2) Venus conjunct Neptune (3) Venus conjunct NN (3) Jupiter opposite Saturn (0) SAturn trine Moon (1) Sateurn square Jupiter (4) SAturn conjunct SN (5) Neptune conjunct Mars (1) Neptune conjuunct ASC (0) Pluto conjunct MC (0) Pluto square Venus (1) SN Conjunct Saturn (0) ASC conjunct Mars (4) ASC square Jupiter (2) ASC conjunct Neptune (0) DSC trine Pluto (0) ASC conjunct ASC (2) MC conjunct mC (3) MC square Venus (2)
ASC-ruler Both: Jupiter
DSC-ruler both: Mercury
IP: Logged |
DD Knowflake Posts: 1212 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 11:31 AM
Well, my parents have the Vertex in 5th house and definitely are married, too. But of course 5th house is also a relationship oriented one.IP: Logged |
Lucia23 Knowflake Posts: 914 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 11:35 AM
DD, looking at those marriage asteroids, the thing that leaps out at me too is that only UNION seems to have some real astrological significance. I have noticed this a lot playing with other synastries, too. I'm not sure UNION always connotes marriage, but UNION definitely means the Union person wants to unite with the planet/angle person...a Union/MC conjunction could be a powerful working relationship, Union/Lust=sex, or intense creative expression. I think BRIEDE, GROOM, BODA are less symbolically potent. Like Denise said, people get married for lots of reasons and love isn't always one of them. UNION indicates wanting to join with someone from a deep emotional motivation...I am not surprised that the two couples who actually married both have UNION-SUN conjunctions! PAIR 2: DD, he is definitely not my ideal groom!!! I find him sexually exciting, fun, and a good friend...I would never be interested in trying to have a conventional one-on-one romantic relationship with him. However, my Groom is conjunct my Valentine natally, and my Valentine is conjunct his AC. In my view of the relationship, this is what I see as playing out most prominently on both sides: -my Venus square his Pluto (0)...I don't think this is necessarily just a one-sided attraction with me/Venus obsessed...I think this is what causes him to come on really, really strong sometimes and me to duck into my shell. I keep thinking of a night right after we first met when he invited me to an event and it was all fancy-dress and I was tender and fragile and still mid-breakup of a long-term relationship, and he seemed all huge and gorgeous and confident, and he was literally physically sweeping me around, and he kind of folded me into his coat, and he stared into my eyes with his hands on my ribs and said, "You SHINE," and I just sort of froze and darted off to the bathroom, and was weird and cold with him the rest of the night...I felt just kind of, nervous, and I couldn't respond at the time to him...I think this is Venus-Pluto -Sun-Sun, Merc-Merc, Sun-Merc, Merc-Sun DWs, even though some of these are at a wider orb...we both really feel them, I think...just the Mercury alone, we are a big chaotic pile of missed text messages and frustrating but small misunderstandings -NN-SN conjunction and DW NN-Jupiter contacts...I have learned an enormous amount with him, for which I am grateful...he says he was a totally different person before knowing me...when we are actually connecting, the relationship has a sweeping, Jupiterian feeling...and LOTS of the time, we are not actually connecting (see Sun-Merc squares, above)...I think the relationship has potential for a sexual fling, but maybe not. We shall see, since we are spending more time together again. Re:: UNION again...I think the conjunctions mean a UNION will actually happen...and the squares mean a thwarted or frustrated Union, where the people may want to connect, but it doesn't quite work. IP: Logged |
Lucia23 Knowflake Posts: 914 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 11:39 AM
I'm partly tempted to guess at those synastries but I'm so bad at it I'll be embarrassed! Maybe I will guess in secret and then wait for Denise and Amowls to weigh in.Are you saying only ONE of the couples has a long-term relationship? IP: Logged |
DD Knowflake Posts: 1212 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 11:43 AM
Lucia,I will make it easier for you. Three of these are crushes I have had (performer, two I have seen live, one I have talked to), and one is a relationship between two men, which lasted over 10 years. IP: Logged |
Lucia23 Knowflake Posts: 914 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 11:45 AM
Alright--I'm guessing couple #4 either has a long-term relationship, OR they are both feel a lifelong connection/involvement with each other. [EDITED: see new guess, below}EDITED: ooh, DD, that actually makes it harder for me to guess! Because I have noticed, looking at synastries, that sometimes very strong/potent synastries aren't really activated both ways. If these were all mutual relationships of some kind, I would find it easier to pick out the gluey ones. Now that I know, #4 could be a celeb crush relationship, activated only on one side, with that Node-Angle business...I shall look again. I bet Denise will get it right! IP: Logged |
Lucia23 Knowflake Posts: 914 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 12:09 PM
Okay--new guess...since only ONE of these is a real relationship, I think #4 is actually one of the celebrity crushes, because: Venus-NN conjunction....I had this in my one unrequited attraction ever, my poor NN had nowhere to put itself! Venus-ASC conjunct Neptune...again, Venus/ASC sparks Neptune's fantasy life, perfect for a celebrity crush. In a relationship, that Saturn-SN DW would be REALLY gluey, not to mention all the intense planet-angle conjunctions...but because there is a 75% chance of each of these being a celebrity crush, this one is just too Neptune-y to be the real-life LTR...it is probably just a HUGE celebrity crush.Knowing there is only one real-life relationship, this is hard because they're ALL Neptune-y. I am going to pick #2 as the real-life relationship, because: -Mars/Saturn DW...glue and energy -Moon/NN If I am right, I think this relationship is a little like PAIR #1 in my list--where the couple stayed together almost 15 years, but finally split up--there's not enough angle-to-angle conjunction (although I would want to check at a wider orb), yet there is a nice balance of Saturn with Sun-Venus, and there's an evenness to the Venus contacts. IP: Logged |
Lara Knowflake Posts: 1213 From: aspideronmars Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 01:35 PM
I say Nr 3.Don't ask me why... lol I think this union think is interesting - l will look at my ex hubby's and also my present love who seems to be coming round again?!?!?!?!!
DD, he asked me for a chart interpretation so l said "yours or ours?" He replied "both" So i gave him what IQ had told me about the synastry and he came back to me and said "I have never seen one of these before...interesting reading...going to have another look at it later on wen things are quiet! xx" LOL!!! I'm shocked at his initial response as it would make most men run a mile!! anyway, i'm waffling now 
IP: Logged |
DD Knowflake Posts: 1212 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 01:59 PM
Thank you for your guesses, Lucia and Lara. But I think I will keep you guessing for a little while longer and post some asteroid aspects (Juno, Eros, Amor, Union). Synastry 1: Eros square Venus (1) Eros trine Mars (1) Eros trine Neptune (2) Eros opposite Pluto (1) Eros trine NN (3) Eros trine ASC (0) ERos conjunct IC (2) Amor trine saturn (0) Amor conjunct Juno (0) Mars trine Eros (0) Jupiter squae Amor (0) Jpuiter trine Union (2)
Synastry 2: Juno opposite Neptune (1) Juno trine Pluto (0) Eros opposite Mars (3) Eros squar Eros (0) Amor square Mercury (0) Saturn opposite Juno (3) Neptune square Juno (0) NN conjunct Juno (2) Mercury square Eros (1) Venus trine eros (2) Pluto trine Eros (1) Jupiter square Amor (0) Sun square Union (0) MOon trine Union (2) synastry 3: Juno opposite MOon (3) Eros conjunct Venus (2) ERos square Pluto (2) Eros square MC (1) Amor conjunct Mars (1) Amor conjunct Amor (1) Amor conjunct ASC (3) Union opposite Saturn (0) Mercury square Juno (1) Pluto opposite Juno (3) Saturn trine Eros (2) Neptune trine Eros (2) Jupiter trine Amor (0) MOon opposite Union (1)
synastry 4: Juno conjunct Mars (3) Juno conjunct Amor (0) Juno conjunct ASC (4) Eros conjunct Juno (3) Eros trine Eros (0) Union conjunct Jupiter (2) Union conjunct JUno (3) Saturn square juno (1) Jupiter opposite Eros (3) Uranus square Eros (1) Mars conjunct Amor (3) Moon conjunct Union (1) So if you guess who is the couple, there are three synastries left. Do you have any idea who is the one who has the crush astrologically? (Please donīt cheat and look up my natal chart. )
IP: Logged |
DD Knowflake Posts: 1212 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 02:00 PM
Lara,that is a great response of him. But it was expected that your Aqua would do the unexpected thing, wasn`t it?  IP: Logged |
Lara Knowflake Posts: 1213 From: aspideronmars Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 02:07 PM
WOW!!!!LOOKIE at those MOON/UNION aspects  hahaha i'm chuckling here  YES! I was gobsmacked - and yes, finally my Aqua stepped up to the plate. Actually, i was crafty - i asked him months ago for his birth time and then when he gave it to me and asked what i found out, i ignored his comment lol So now he's eager i guess  IP: Logged |
Lara Knowflake Posts: 1213 From: aspideronmars Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 02:16 PM
ummm Prince Charles and Camilla don't have any UNION conjuncts/oppositions  IP: Logged |
Lucia23 Knowflake Posts: 914 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 02:21 PM
Okay, these apply if the asteroid synastries are in the same order as the planet synastries--of course at this point I am way out of my depth!I am basing this partly on the idea that Eros can represent creative inspiration/a muse...so I think groupies will often have a bunch of their planets contacting a star's Eros, though I may have this backwards. With Jim Morrison (I'm way too young to have actually been his groupie, but he has come up in some of my work) I am the Node person: NN conjunct Sun (1), NN conjunct Eros (0)...also his Venus right on my MC, which makes sense. #1=The person with the NN trine the other's Mercury and square the other's Pluto is the one with the crush #2=this is the real-life relationship #3=The person with NN conjunct the other's Mercury is the one with the crush #4=the person with NN conjunct the other's Venus is the one with the crush IP: Logged |
Lucia23 Knowflake Posts: 914 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 03:32 PM
I was just looking at my synastry with my Scorpio friend again (synastry #2) and noticed that I missed a UNION aspect...my UNION conjunct his MARS (2). I think this backs up my sense that Union isn't always about marriage...the Union person wants to unite with the planet or angle Union conjuncts--therefore it would mean I want to unite with his ACTION.Whereas in the pairs #3 and #4, the married couples I listed, both have tight Union-Sun conjunctions---the Union person wants to unite with the WHOLE Sun person, hence marriage! I bet a Union-Sun DW conjunction would be reaaaallly powerful--it might even unite a couple who lacked some glue aspects in non-asteroid synastry, or at least make them feel more connected/compelled by each other. IP: Logged |
Lara Knowflake Posts: 1213 From: aspideronmars Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 03:38 PM
Do you DD and Lucia think that it works in the draco too?IP: Logged |
DD Knowflake Posts: 1212 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 29, 2009 04:24 PM
Lucia,I`m taking it all in, and smile to myself. But I still will tantalize you a bit longer. I`m curious to know what Denise will say. In the meantime while we are waiting, I have two more synastries (not mine). One led to marriage; in the other case they worked together, and one was interested in the other, but nothing ever developed. Synastry 1: His Sun conjuunct her Sun (0) his Sun opposite her Moon (3) His Sun square her NN (3) his Sun square her ASC (1) his Moon trine her Saturn (0) his Moon trine her Uranus (0) his Mercury square her Neptune (0) his Mercury conjunct her IC (0) his Venus conjunct her Mars (0) his Venus conjunct her Pluto (1) His Mars opposite her Saturn (2) his Saturn trine her Mercury (1) his Uranus conjunct her Sun (3) his Neptune squar her Uranus (1) his Pluto conjunct her Mars (3) his Pluto square her Saturn (2) his NN conjunct her Mercury (1) his NN conjunct her Venus (2) his NN trine her ASC (1) his DSC conjunct her mars (4) his ASC square her Saturn (1) his MC trine her Sun (1) his MC square her Mercury (1) his MC squre her Venus (2)
his Juno squre her Mercury (2) his Eros square her Mars (2) his Eros opposite her Saturn (3) his Eros squar her Eros (0) his Amor squar eher Mars (0) his Amor trine her Jupiter (0) his Amor square her Pluto (1) his Amor trine her MC (0) his Union conjunct her Neptune (1) his Union squar ehr Mc (0) his Venus conjunct her Eros (3) his Mars square her Eros (0) his Pluto conjunct her Eros (0) his DSC conjunct her Eros (1) his Neptune opposite her Amor (2) his SN conjunct her Union (2) his MC square her Union (2) Synastry 2 his Sun conjunct her Sun (4) his Sun square her Mars (2) his sun trine her Saturn (0) his Mercury conjunct her Venus (0) his Mercury squar eher Neptune (2) his Venus conjunct her Mercury (3) his Venus conjunct her Pltuo (0) his Venus square her MC (2) (his Venus conjunct her ASC 6) his Mars square her Mercury (0) his Mars square her ASC (2) his Mars conjunct her MC (1) his Jupiter trin her Sun (0) his SAturn trine her Moon (1) his Saturn trine her Mars (2) his Uranus conjunct her Sun (1) his Uranus trine her Saturn (2) his Neptune trine her DSC (1) his Pluto conjunct her Mercury (0) his Pluto conjunct her ASC (1) his Plutos quare her MC (2) his NN conjunct her MOon (4) his NN trine her Mars (0) his DSC onjunct her Mercury (0) his DSC conjunct her Pluto (4) his ASC Conjunct her DSC (2) his MC conjunct her Saturn (3)
his Juno square her MOon (0) his Juno trine her Uranus (0) his Eros square her Mercury (1) his Eros square her Pltuo (2) his Eros conjunct her MC (0) his Amor square her Pluto (0) his Amor square her Juno (0) his Amor conjunct her MC (3) his Union square her Venus (0) his Union conjunct her Neptune (0) his Union square her Amor (1) his Union square her Union (1) his Venus conjunct her Union (0) his Mercury conjunct her Amor (2) his Mercury conjunct her Union (0) So who is the married couple? And in the other synastry, who was the one having that amorous interest? IP: Logged | |