Author
|
Topic: Super-Rich People Should Be Ashamed Of Themselves
|
GypseeWind Knowflake Posts: 1247 From: Dayton,Ohio USA Registered: May 2009
|
posted August 12, 2009 12:29 PM
Deux! Bartering is IT! I do it all the time, and once you start and get others into it, it is incredibly effective. You wouldn't believe how many times someone else has the thing you are looking for and vice-versa. Not just with goods, but with services. My friend trades me one dog grooming for one session of babysitting.You just have to start somewhere, you know be the first one to mention it and see how it takes off....just like this thread! IP: Logged |
downtomars Knowflake Posts: 425 From: NY Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 12, 2009 12:31 PM
quote: personally i would spend my whole life trying to decorate it then clean it.
IC in Taurus Venus trine IC Vesta in Taurus in 4th house trine Saturn in Virgo I hear you loud and clear DepTaurus! IP: Logged |
Valus Knowflake Posts: 1092 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 12, 2009 12:40 PM
Ken Wilber How To Stage A 2nd-Tier Protest http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgcNZWqSwf8
Integral Politics http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQRUu_4W2j8
IP: Logged |
Dervish Knowflake Posts: 228 From: Registered: May 2009
|
posted August 12, 2009 03:41 PM
I've noticed plenty of people watch things that make them sick, and I'm wondering why watch?I sometimes do, but it's because I'm somewhere else and have it shoved down my throat. For example, a fitness center I go to frequently has on infotainment disguised as news (FOX, CNN, etc) and I absolutely cannot stand them most of the time. But I never watch these channels from my own home ('course I don't even get cable or dish). And even at places like the fitness center, if I can't see anyone watching it, I WILL turn it off (or if there's more than one TV playing and one is being watched, change the channel to help tune out the other annoying channel). I've actually thought of changing fitness centers since they removed the volume limit on the TVs. quote: Bartering is IT
I have yet to buy a single computer part. I got it all through barter--much of it from a guy I housesat for who is known to not pay up the last he owes you when he doesn't need you anymore, and he's a major pack rat who hadn't gotten rid of an older computer, so I took that computer instead of payment for housesitting while he was in Mexico & in exchange for doing real estate research for him, got him to pay for several months of internet connection. Granted, it does have some problems that make me want to go out and buy a new computer someday when I can afford to... quote: i guess it is bad karma when california fires strikes the houses of celeberties down there. maybe its a sign that you have too much stuff. whats that word umm oh yeah DONATE some stuff please i need it.
The karma comes from a mix of insane real estate deals (if the insurance companies & real estate biz were to combine, it would be VASTLY different in marketing and pricing), and also insane government programs like this: http://www.reason.com/news/show/29067.html quote: In 1980 I built a wonderful beach house. Four bedrooms -- every room with a view of the Atlantic Ocean.It was an absurd place to build, right on the edge of the ocean. All that stood between my house and ruin was a hundred feet of sand. My father told me: "Don’t do it; it’s too risky. No one should build so close to an ocean." But I built anyway. Why? As my eager-for-the-business architect said, "Why not? If the ocean destroys your house, the government will pay for a new one." What? Why would the government do that? Why would it encourage people to build in such risky places? That would be insane. But the architect was right. If the ocean took my house, Uncle Sam would pay to replace it under the National Flood Insurance Program. Since private insurers weren’t dumb enough to sell cheap insurance to people who built on the edges of oceans or rivers, Congress decided the government should step in and do it. So if the ocean ate what I built, I could rebuild and rebuild again and again -- there was no limit to the number of claims on the same property in the same location -- up to a maximum of $250,000 per house per flood. And you taxpayers would pay for it. Thanks. I did have to pay insurance premiums, but they were dirt cheap -- mine never exceeded a few hundred dollars a year. Why does Uncle Sam offer me cheap insurance? "It saves federal dollars," replied James Lee Witt, head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), when I did a 20/20 report on this boondoggle. "If this insurance wasn’t here," he said, "then people would be building in those areas anyway. Then it would cost the American taxpayers more [in relief funds] if a disaster hit." That’s government logic: Since we always mindlessly use taxpayer money to bail out every idiot who takes an expensive risk, let’s get some money up front by selling them insurance first. The insurance, of course, has encouraged more people to build on the edges of rivers and oceans. The National Flood Insurance Program is currently the biggest property insurance writer in the United States, putting taxpayers on the hook for more than $640 billion in property. Subsidized insurance goes to movie stars in Malibu, to rich people in Kennebunkport (where the Bush family has its vacation compound), to rich people in Hyannis (where the Kennedy family has its), and to all sorts of people like me who ought to be paying our own way.
And for some much deserved satire of those who build in the fire zones of So Ca: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJaeSnLj3iI IP: Logged |
Lara Knowflake Posts: 1335 From: aspideronmars Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 12, 2009 06:46 PM
zzzzzzzI think it's rich to b1tch on people whom you don't know personally and therefore have no idea how much they do for charity or those less fortunate. I think jealousy of others wealth is just as bad as the things they are accused of! My 2 cents... IP: Logged |
Xodian Moderator Posts: 94 From: Canada Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 12, 2009 08:25 PM
Its amazing how quick people are willing to jump on the case of those who actually ended up attaining a legitimate standing of prestige and power and are ready to lump them togather into a huge big stereotype and then cry a bloody river about the close mindedness of those deep fry them on their own ignorant and close minded views. The perpetual hypocrisy of such pompous being who ironically haven't achieved much themselves in their own lives yet have such snooty views of others don't fails to amuse me.Its also ironic that these "Super Rich" people are usually the biggest benifactors to charities and projects to revitalize infrastructure in improvished regions. They are the ones who usually lead the way and yet its not enough for the pompous under-achievers who themselves didn't amount to much but do like to talk crud without an ounce of reasoning behind it other then envy. For Shame... It really saddens me that such thinking could exist in a forum like this one. IP: Logged |
Cheshire Kat Knowflake Posts: 328 From: Wonderland Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 12, 2009 09:16 PM
I don't know why I post at LL anymore, I've outgrown Astrology and Im tired of it..nowadays..IP: Logged |
downtomars Knowflake Posts: 425 From: NY Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 12, 2009 09:36 PM
This thread is turning into the Communist Manifesto! I agree with the fact that we are all being somewhat judgmental but there are some facts we need to get straight: The super rich HAVE TO be contributors! With taxes and charitable giving to avoid major taxation, contributing is something that is hard to run away from. They just have to pick whatever cause works for them. If you think about it, we are ALL contributors to infrastructure here at home (wherever everyone is from) it is called being a “productive member of society”, as long as you pay taxes, you are helping! Excess is only useful to make the “little people” want to work harder, a tool to make people envious, to make us want to consume, consume, consume and keep our capitalist economy going (in the US). Economies are build on envy. I blame THE MEDIA!!! <evil laughs> It seems to have gotten worst in the U.S. because the gap between the rich and the poor is so HUGE and do I even have to mention the economy? People trying to live in excess who cannot do it, lives are in shambles… I have never, ever been envious of money and what it can buy. I’m more of a love person. I would feel more envious if someone said they were so happily in love than if they said they had a million dollars! Also, what is so wrong with fame without loads of cash behind it? Remember the “old days” when that was the actual case. People got enough to be happily well off, but not “lear jet” well of. Personally when I get a compliment I feel like a million bucks! One of my favorite songs: quote: Money, get away get a good job with more pay and you're O.K. money, it's a gas grab that cash with both hands and make a stash new car, caviar, four star daydream think I'll buy me a football teamMoney, get back I'm alright, Jack, keep your hands off my stack money, it's a hit don't give me that do goody good ******** I'm in the hi-fidelity first class travelling set and I think I need a Lear jet Money, it's a crime share it fairlybut don't take a slice of my pie money, so they say is the root of all evil today but if you ask for a rise it's no surprise that they're giving none away, away, away
ETA: My Gold (4955) falls in my 4th house (family, home...)
IP: Logged |
ghanima81 Moderator Posts: 37 From: Maine Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 12, 2009 09:39 PM
I'm of the "judge not, lest ye be judged" camp on this one. Of course it could seem disgusting in one corner, but who are we to tell others how to spend the money they earn? People will come to their own realizations in their own time, I feel it a waste of time to loftily judge them from below their thrones since their stories are not over yet. Life is a journey, with no written path for any individual. We can merely hope that we learn what we were put here to learn and maybe send out a hope that others will enjoy the same fate. To put our own judgments or values on others is just asking to have them put theirs on us, and I wholeheartedly think we all don't like to have the mirror cast back at us... Anyway, live and let live. Do what you can and feel is right within yourself. You and you alone will know at the end if you did right.. Ghani IP: Logged |
lechien Knowflake Posts: 269 From: i live in a kitchen Registered: May 2009
|
posted August 12, 2009 10:26 PM
what i meant was bartering is also just the idea of currency manifested more in the personal value judgement. there will be people who will try to attain more by bartering, just like with money too. it's not the money itself, it's the idea of it that can become evil, and as i said, if there isn't money, people will always come up with different ways to achieve similar effects. IP: Logged |
MyVirgoMask Knowflake Posts: 1195 From: Bay Area, CA Registered: May 2009
|
posted August 12, 2009 11:03 PM
Meh, money. You either have it or you don't. If you do, give it to some people who need it, because that makes sense.It's a very simple philosophy to me. Those who don't share some of their wealth are not generous souls. And I think a lack of generosity is an ugly thing. However, I will also say that I've seen people who aren't wealthy be very stingy as well. Ugly behavior abounds, regardless of how much money a person has. If you only had a moderate amount of money, and a friend of yours had a financial emergency all of a sudden, would you offer to help? Just the answer to that question alone says a lot about a person, I feel...regardless of charity and what organization you give to. Charities are a tax write-off. How generous a person are you, really?
IP: Logged |
MyVirgoMask Knowflake Posts: 1195 From: Bay Area, CA Registered: May 2009
|
posted August 12, 2009 11:07 PM
Also, those who flash around their wealth aren't really wealthy to me. They're just neuvo riche, as I think Katatonic mentioned. It's just like the behavior of a starving person at a banquet, who's mad with hunger. They'll eat and eat to the point of bursting and then stuff their pockets with icing instead of bread. IP: Logged |
Lara Knowflake Posts: 1335 From: aspideronmars Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 12, 2009 11:09 PM
LOLjust face it.... they're rich and you are not! This thread is really showing the real characters behind all the air-kissing sweetness we witness on LL. Shameful. If you wanna be rich then stop slagging off the people whose club you wish to join and start working HARD. ALL these wealthy people WORKED HARD and I find it absolutely disgusting that other people are bitter and envious enough to sit around bitch1ng and moaning at more fortunate persons in such a negative fashion. Grow up and get a life!! IP: Logged |
MyVirgoMask Knowflake Posts: 1195 From: Bay Area, CA Registered: May 2009
|
posted August 12, 2009 11:12 PM
I hope you're not talking about me, Lara. I have no problem with wealth (I come from it). But I'm not going to presume someone with money worked their butt off to make it either... some people are born lucky and have everything handed to them on a platter. And that's fine too. IP: Logged |
Writesomething Knowflake Posts: 1123 From: meet me in montauk Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 12, 2009 11:19 PM
Moonwitch and T- 
IP: Logged |
Lara Knowflake Posts: 1335 From: aspideronmars Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 12, 2009 11:26 PM
MVM- if it makes you feel better, I was writing my post before your one so I never saw it before I posted!Everyone has their own karma and all men are equals. There is 'balance' in everything; everyone if one looks closely. I'm sure you'll agree! Only a fool would waste life picking apart another mans life and I know you are not a fool IP: Logged |
MyVirgoMask Knowflake Posts: 1195 From: Bay Area, CA Registered: May 2009
|
posted August 13, 2009 12:15 AM
Neither are you a fool, Lara Yeah, I'm no good with trashing people with money. I mean, I can. But again, I know a lot of people without money who can be douches too, so there's that balance again  IP: Logged |
Dervish Knowflake Posts: 228 From: Registered: May 2009
|
posted August 13, 2009 01:33 AM
Lara, I pretty much agree that trashing the wealthy for being wealthy isn't a sign of enlightenment or understanding and much is actually sour grapes, but ALL who are wealthy have worked hard? Just how are you defining "wealthy" and "work"? Because the way I define these terms, there's no way you can emphasize that "ALL" are the result of hard work (or even most). IP: Logged |
wheels of cheese Knowflake Posts: 535 From: Registered: May 2009
|
posted August 13, 2009 05:25 AM
Lara. Can't we all have different opinions without telling each other to "grow up and get a life"?
IP: Logged |
wheels of cheese Knowflake Posts: 535 From: Registered: May 2009
|
posted August 13, 2009 05:35 AM
It's not about being envious, at all. I can't say that strongly enough. I wouldn't want to be rich. For me it's about people consuming more resources than they need. Some people are way over the top. I see nothing wrong with saying that. IP: Logged |
Lara Knowflake Posts: 1335 From: aspideronmars Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 13, 2009 05:44 AM
Hey Wheels  I think opinions are great except 99% of this thread appears to be more slagging and judging not an objective opinion! Agree? Money doesn't grow on trees, it's obtained through hard work. If you are the son of an oil tycoon or an Internet geek then you are simply living a good life this time... like I said, there is balance so the best thing to do I personally think and try to do is just be as positive and as focused as you can be on your own life. After all, what does all this "JK Rowling lives in a massive house" and "Mel Gibson Is a spoilt brat" achieve? lol it's a total contradiction to pay to watch either or their movies and then slag them off for having money YOU gave them for your own pleasure!! One could argue that instead of paying $20 to see the movie you could give it to a child in Africa or a homeless person to sleep a night in a shelter! IP: Logged |
wheels of cheese Knowflake Posts: 535 From: Registered: May 2009
|
posted August 13, 2009 05:57 AM
Hey Lara  Yep, I'm completely open to the fact that I'm judgmental on this one. I'm not apologising for that. It sucks yes, but I don't claim to be enlightened. I think people can go over the top New Agey and forget that it's actually quite alright to call people out on their sh!t.  Clooney's my target.  I just think that getting more money by advertising plastic crap is... well....wrong, especially when you are loaded already. Espresso machines! Which will end up in the landfill. I don't have a problem with people being rich. Really. Someone (think downtomars without scrolling back) said this thread's turning into the Communist Manifesto, lol, that couldn't be further from my point of view actually although I could see what she meant. I'm all for personal responsibility and conscious living, which is the ultimate in individualism, not communism. It is a contradiction I agree, to slag someone and then still be embroiled in the world that you disapprove of. IP: Logged |
lechien Knowflake Posts: 269 From: i live in a kitchen Registered: May 2009
|
posted August 13, 2009 09:20 AM
i dunno, advertising to-be blockbuster movies... is that a sin of this George Cloony dude? it's the industry, it's the audience, Cloony guy's just part of it. and many rich people donate for charity and that is admirable, but at the same time as MVM said, it's also god for their tax management. it's really all relative. we can't just single out someone's attitude or status or action and target them to give them labels. if anything is wrong with this world, it's kind of all of our fault. only the collective conscious can change something huge like the whole system of how the world is turning.IP: Logged |
wheels of cheese Knowflake Posts: 535 From: Registered: May 2009
|
posted August 13, 2009 09:32 AM
No, as I said before I don't have a problem with the movies part of it. That's his job, (not that I agree with how much he is paid, it's excessive IMO). It's the extras on the side, putting your face to products for more money when you've already got so much from your profession. People don't know when to stop.IP: Logged |
wheels of cheese Knowflake Posts: 535 From: Registered: May 2009
|
posted August 13, 2009 09:33 AM
@ "dude". ETA: quote: it's kind of all of our fault.
Yes, that is EXACTLY what I'm saying too. What's the point in some people recycling every milk bottle and piece of aluminium foil when some Hollywood idiot buys a new handbag every day made by some small-boned child in China, and I'm supposed to go "To each their own, shouldn't judge". Bollocks I shouldn't judge! What I'm saying is that these people are not taking personal responsibility at all. Pimping plastic crap to the masses? I fail to see how that's ok. It's not ok. The world's dying and people are still flying around the world in their private jets? It all seems so frivolous. Sorry, but I just feel really really strongly about this. IP: Logged |