posted December 16, 2014 07:31 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
What makes it okay is that T has been slandering me here for years. Even now, she can't apologize for anything. I do apologize for my part. And I would have continued to ignore her, but she crossed the line. So, yeah, since she brought it to LL, it needed to be aired out. And she thinks I'm saying stuff behind her back, which I certainly am not.

---

posted December 16, 2014 07:31 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
AFFIDAVIT

I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that everything I've posted on this thread is true and factual to the extent of my knowledge and that what was not known by me personally has been so designated in the aforementioned.

The following shall serve as my digital signature: RM

---

Nobody here is a member of a clique. That wasn't T winding people (including me) up on facebook - you know who it reminded me of, because I dealt with her before, but only briefly experienced her rudeness. It made me laugh, because it was unexpected, but I didn't like what she seemed to be doing to a certain someone that I won't name. And yet, who has been penalized for that, over and over? ME.

Four years ago, you used me in some sort of game with the people who left the site. That FB group, that I removed myself from, but ended up staying friends with most of the members there, because they're good people, and didn't try to screw with me, or my friendships. It all got quickly sorted out, and I've been mostly polite to you, because I try to let **** go, but there was something very fishy going on there, and I was obviously targeted because at the time, I was so quiet, and most people still didn't know me that well. I ended up having friends stand up for me, and whomever it was who was the actual problem, didn't get away with pinning it on *me*.

I have wished that I'd just stayed away after that, but even if I had, I would still be accused of screwing with a certain someone, just because of who I'm friends with. I'm sure it's their cousin.

posted December 16, 2014 07:31 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
You lack of directing criticism to T for her slander is what I'm talking about, but you are quick to do so at me. And I expect such.

---

If you so baaaadly want to make me a mod, then go for it! You seem to ascribe such a strange responsibility onto me (that was a joke, I don't want to be a mod).

posted December 16, 2014 07:32 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Lonake:
PD. That would depend upon if she ever gave out her name here. And that's as I'm reading the rules. I could be wrong.

If I'm wrong, then he obvs goofed, and he also obvs fixed it.

---

Lonake,

posted December 16, 2014 07:34 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
But I don't talk behind your back. I haven't said anything bad or good about you in recent history. I do believe someone has been playing both of us against each other; however, that still does not detract from the fact that you blatantly denied the facts that youj know are true. While I feel genuinely sorry for you having been lied to by others about me (no doubt to rile you up), that empathy is clouded by your denials of what you know is truth in my posts (subject to your memory, of course).

---

posted December 16, 2014 07:35 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Lonake:
PD. That would depend upon if she ever gave out her name here. And that's as I'm reading the rules. I could be wrong.

If I'm wrong, then he obvs goofed, and he also obvs fixed it.

---

By mere logic, doesn't it defeat the purpose to have such a rule if the administrators of the website who clearly do not want to be held liable end up releasing information about a user? It's simple legality. You create laws to protect yourself. So why would you violate your own law? That's absurd.

posted December 16, 2014 07:40 AM            

Hi Sheaa!

posted December 16, 2014 07:43 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
Yeah, it's related to absolving LL of liability should someone give out their personal information. But I do agree that full names would be a breach by Admin; however, I'm sure a search would show that T used her first name here in the past. I could be wrong, though, because 26taurus did delete a number of her posts.

---

You have also scrubbed the forums clean of a number of posts and entire threads Randall. Like I mentioned before.

I do remember a post a very long time ago about the meaning of people's names here before, but probably deleted my first name after that, if that is the thread you are talking about.

And while I know many old members knew my first name, no one used it out of respect of privacy. So for you to do so here shows just what you are all about.

You thought it would upset me that you put my first name out there w/o my permission. TBH, I don't care really, but I still think it was an a-hole move on your part and think you were doing it to try and wind me up. It also, once again goes against your own rules.

Should I share some emails and chats I've dug up?

I'd share the text messages you sent a number of years ago but they are to explicit and raunchy and I won't subject others to them.

posted December 16, 2014 07:52 AM            

I don't quite understand what he's trying to do with posting old threads of mine and trying to put my first name out there.

posted December 16, 2014 07:55 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
There are three pages of search results of her using her real name. The issue is that she claimed she asked people not to do so. She never objected once that I can see.

---

Please stop being a psycho and searching my name on your own site. It's become weird at this point.