Lindaland
  Lindaland Central
  "Who are you calling a b!tch?"- Kate Figes (Page 8)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 11 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   "Who are you calling a b!tch?"- Kate Figes
lioneye68
Knowflake

Posts: 6062
From: Canada
Registered: Apr 2003

posted February 16, 2007 08:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for lioneye68     Edit/Delete Message
That was an Aquarian moon way of saying if you only value females who are sexually alluring, then you are dismissing all the rest of them. The majority. And the men end up lonely and unsatisfied, and likewise for too many women. And everyone needs someone, so that's sad.

IP: Logged

Mirandee
Knowflake

Posts: 4812
From: South of the Thumb - Taurus, Pisces, Cancer
Registered: Sep 2004

posted February 17, 2007 03:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mirandee     Edit/Delete Message
Wow, this thread has certainly taken on a life of it's own. I had a lot of catching up to do.

I agree with a lot of the things that Dulce Luna said here and I agree with lioneyes' statements. The problem with basing everything on looks is that sometimes we are so enamored by the beauty of the way the package is wrapped that we don't want to open it to find out what is inside. I think that happens a lot in the case of beautiful women in the eyes of many men and vice versa. What is inside a person, man or woman, is what is going to be most important in the long run. For that reason if we base everything on what a man or woman looks like we are not only shortchanging ourselves but the other person as well. It IS degrading to use other people to fulfill our own ego needs. Like I said, I love men but I don't have to see them naked to appreciate them for the person they are.

I also can see where Lotus is coming from. I have had my disagreements with the way that Lotus presents her spiritual beliefs and views on more than one occasion for the same reasons some of you have told her here, but I can see change and growth in Lotus so I know that she is definitely on a spiritual path. Like some of you there are also many things that I find I agree with Lotus on. I think, and I might be wrong, that what Lotus is saying here is that sex has a spiritual purpose and is not meant to be abused and in no way is the use of other people for our own sexual gratification acceptable on a spiritual level.

Sex is a good thing. I don't think that any of us here would disagree with that. But anything good can also be abused and used for bad purposes as well. All of creation is good. Our world and all that is in it is good but look what we have done to our environment by our misuses and abuses of it for the sake of profit. Sex in the context of love between two people is a beautiful thing. Having sex in porno movies for pay is degrading to both participants. Any one who would do that has no self-respect so it is ludicrous to think they respect the other person. You can't respect others if you don't respect yourself first. Just as you can't love others unless you first love yourself. I mean love of self in a healthy way not an egotistical, narcisstic way.

Just recently Anna Nicole Smith died at the young age of 39 years. She was, well what you can say, famous for being famous. She began her rise to fame and fortune by being a topless dancer. She married a man in his 90's who died shortly after their marriage and left her half of his estate. She was a Penthouse or Playboy ( forget which ) centerfold. So she made her choice to use her looks and body to amass fame and fortune. Where did it get her? Is it doing her any good where she is now? What legacy did she leave behind? Is the world a better place for her having been here and shown her naked body to the world? Do those who used her to make a profit for themselves care that she is gone? Or will they just go find another woman like her to use for profit in the name of "celebrating" women?

It is all about choice. We either choose ourselves and what material gratification we can obtain in this life or we choose a spiritual path that is based more on serving others, respecting others and loving each other as one with creation and attempting in what imperfect way we can muster up to make this a better world. In short, we choose ourselves or God and that is the fundamental choice we make that sets in motion what other choices we make in our lifetime.

Lotus said that this is hell. I disagree with that. I believe that this is the plain where we make our eternal fundamental choice. I do not believe that either heaven or hell are a place but rather a state of existance for all of eternity. We were not created for this world. We were created for eternity. I think - and it is only a hypothesis because no one knows what the next life is like until they die - that we get for all eternity what we choose here. If we choose God, whatever we conceive God to be, that is what we get for all eternity. If we choose ourselves that is what we get for all eternity. Ourselves. All alone for all eternity without any of the distractions that we have in this lifetime. After all, isn't being alone without anyone to love or love us in return the greatest fear we all have? Wouldn't that be worse than a place of fire or anything else?

These are just my thoughts for what they are worth and I think that the point that Lotus is trying to make here is that it is not right to use other people for sexual gratification or any other type of ego gratification.

I hope that I didn't come off as "preachy" here because that is not my intention. I am just giving my thoughts on all of this and I know that some of you won't agree and that's okay. It is as some of you stated, we are all on different paths, we all have our own truths, but we are all heading for the same place. In the process we are all fumbling our way through the maze of different ideologies, mostly hand me downs that have been misinterpreted, misquoted, distorted and what not. So when it comes to advice it is truly " the blind leading the blind."

IP: Logged

sue g
Knowflake

Posts: 8591
From: former land of the leprechaun
Registered: Sep 2004

posted February 17, 2007 09:08 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for sue g     Edit/Delete Message
http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/012694-2.html

I loved what Venus said on the above thread.....

For me it takes away all the ridiculous and furtive connotations ( of sex is a dirty word ) that our mothers'generation may have grown up with...


""SEX IS RELIGION""...

That is so hot..... and cool all rolled into one...

Anyone wanna hop on a plane to India with me??

IP: Logged

Focused Chi
Knowflake

Posts: 83
From: A quiet place ignoring his 20' tall fire breathing EGO
Registered: Dec 2005

posted February 17, 2007 09:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Focused Chi     Edit/Delete Message
lioneye,

Thank you for those words. I needed that message.

Being lost in what I expect, I was dismissing a precious woman who has so bravely been trying to win my attention.

I have always been so critical of physical beauty.

I felt great shame and sorrow seeing this in myself today.

Now, only Joy in that I have grown closer to my goal of having wisdom.

You gave me an "Ah Ha!" moment today lioneye.

*wanders off to make a phone call*

------------------
"Your life is what your thoughts make it."
~Marcus Aurelius

IP: Logged

sue g
Knowflake

Posts: 8591
From: former land of the leprechaun
Registered: Sep 2004

posted February 17, 2007 09:32 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for sue g     Edit/Delete Message
I remember a guy saying to me once......its not the look of a woman to me, physical looks are immaterial...the beauty of a woman is what you "feel" when making love to her...

Lovely young guy he was!

IP: Logged

Dulce Luna
Knowflake

Posts: 4598
From: The Asylum
Registered: Mar 2006

posted February 17, 2007 11:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dulce Luna     Edit/Delete Message
Whew Mirandee! You basically summed everything up.

IP: Logged

Dulce Luna
Knowflake

Posts: 4598
From: The Asylum
Registered: Mar 2006

posted February 17, 2007 11:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dulce Luna     Edit/Delete Message
dp

IP: Logged

lotusheartone
Knowflake

Posts: 238
From: MOther & Father GOd
Registered: Feb 2008

posted February 17, 2007 11:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for lotusheartone     Edit/Delete Message
Mirandee, thanks!

I travel back and forth from this realm to the spirit one..all these different levels..one level os suicides, they are not tormented and tortured, they are learning groups, going over what they have done..how they will next try to attempt to rectify their karma...
when they are ready, they will choose their next life..this
goes on for each level of crimes committed

I really think this Hell
HELL
5533 = 16 The Tower
which means breaking down the existing ways ,to live the True way, the right way...
by the Universal Laws that Govern us
given by God

I can only share what has thus been shone to me...
I do not want people to be afraid of Death..you are much more than this body
the you-of-you is your soul

if we brought balance to Earth
we would easily live to be 1,000
if we chose to stay in that body
for that long...

Did you see the movie down to Earth
with Chris Rock?
sometimes changes occur...
but all his done on a soul level

and all who are here on Earth
are connected to their OverSoul
in Heaven
As Above
So Below

LOve and Light and Understanding to ALL...

I am done my blah blah blah

IP: Logged

Mirandee
Knowflake

Posts: 4812
From: South of the Thumb - Taurus, Pisces, Cancer
Registered: Sep 2004

posted February 17, 2007 11:27 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mirandee     Edit/Delete Message
I wouldn't go so far as to say that " sex is religion" because if anyone truly thought that was the case it would be avoided by a large percentage of people.

I agree that sex is a spiritual experience between two people who truly love and respect each other. No other act hints more at the oneness of all of creation than the sexual act. Marriage itself is intended for the purpose of the two becoming one. Not in the sense that you lose your own individual identities but in the sense of uniting the two souls as one. That oneness will never be achieved in a relationship that does not include a total commitment to one partner.

However, it is not spiritual in nature at all when it is treated as just an act of self-gratification without any kind of commitment or love between the two individuals.

As I stated, sex is good but it can also be used for bad purposes just like everything else in creation.

IP: Logged

lotusheartone
Knowflake

Posts: 238
From: MOther & Father GOd
Registered: Feb 2008

posted February 17, 2007 11:35 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for lotusheartone     Edit/Delete Message
Mirandee, your posts are wonderful!
Big Hug of LOve

IP: Logged

Mirandee
Knowflake

Posts: 4812
From: South of the Thumb - Taurus, Pisces, Cancer
Registered: Sep 2004

posted February 17, 2007 12:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mirandee     Edit/Delete Message
Thank you, Lotus And {{{{{*}}}}}'s back at ya.

I have something astounding to share with you and everyone regarding Rainbow that I intend to post sometime today. Right now I have things that I have to attend to so I lack the time.

Lotus, I think that you particularly are going to love this because though we didn't get it in the way we were praying to get it, we did get that miracle that you and I were talking about on Rainbow's thread. It's something that Rainbow left behind for my daughter, Lia and myself but I think it is also meant for all of you to share.

IP: Logged

Scorpionic Web
Knowflake

Posts: 513
From: Pennsylvania
Registered: Dec 2005

posted February 17, 2007 12:05 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Scorpionic Web     Edit/Delete Message
Sue is absolutely right. Sexual allure has nothing to do with appearance.

As a Scorpio male, I know we consistently rank rather low on the scale of "handsome" males of the zodiac, yet we are consistently considered one of the most "sexually alluring" signs. Conversely, there are signs like Aquarius, whose women consistently rank in the stereotypically "most physically attractive" category, but they would often rather stain amoeba slides for microscopic evaluation than exude sexuality, and therefore, often rank low in the "allure" category.

The cliche blonde 36-24-36 of Hugh Hefner's Playboy vision actually really serves to hurt men's reputation. It persuades women think this type of figure is what men actually want or expect.

I find I'm most attracted to chubby brunettes, but of course men will appreciate photos of any naked woman if it is available. Repremanding a man for enjoying any naked woman of any shape or size is like beating a dog for eating the meat left sitting on the kitchen table. Male or female, we are all still animals.

Much like Astrology or Psychology, I consider Sex to be a Social Science.

IP: Logged

lotusheartone
Knowflake

Posts: 238
From: MOther & Father GOd
Registered: Feb 2008

posted February 17, 2007 12:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for lotusheartone     Edit/Delete Message
That's where you would be wrong

we are not animals

we are divine souls

look at your own naked woman
the one you truly love

do not disrespect her
by looking at others

how rude. ...

IP: Logged

lotusheartone
Knowflake

Posts: 238
From: MOther & Father GOd
Registered: Feb 2008

posted February 17, 2007 12:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for lotusheartone     Edit/Delete Message
if you want to look at like Science

let's see..what kind of people are absorbed with Sex, it's all they want to talk about, it's a religion to them, and Science...

obviously you have issues to work on...

only the dissatisfied would waste so much time trying to make up excuse up for their own hang-ups...

there are site's for people like this

this is a spiritual site
and the Truth is
Our Soul does not have Sex

so, if your going to Master
YourSelf
you will have to get over your obsession!

LOve and Respect for ALL. . .

IP: Logged

Scorpionic Web
Knowflake

Posts: 513
From: Pennsylvania
Registered: Dec 2005

posted February 17, 2007 12:18 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Scorpionic Web     Edit/Delete Message
I'm not trying to master myself. Its within my uncontrollable urges that I find I most enjoy life.

If I mastered myself, then self exploration would cease, I would become bored, and I would no longer see the adventure in life.

IP: Logged

lotusheartone
Knowflake

Posts: 238
From: MOther & Father GOd
Registered: Feb 2008

posted February 17, 2007 12:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for lotusheartone     Edit/Delete Message
you are missing out one the greatest adventure and exploration...

you have limited yourSelf only the material existence...

your free wi11 choice

as you wish!

IP: Logged

Scorpionic Web
Knowflake

Posts: 513
From: Pennsylvania
Registered: Dec 2005

posted February 17, 2007 12:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Scorpionic Web     Edit/Delete Message
whoa, I never said I'm limiting my exploration to strictly the material.

IP: Logged

lotusheartone
Knowflake

Posts: 238
From: MOther & Father GOd
Registered: Feb 2008

posted February 17, 2007 12:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for lotusheartone     Edit/Delete Message
you said exploration would cease..yet exploration never ceases, there is always
more knowledge to attain. ...

IP: Logged

sue g
Knowflake

Posts: 8591
From: former land of the leprechaun
Registered: Sep 2004

posted February 17, 2007 12:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for sue g     Edit/Delete Message
SW

Its a pluto thing....

Not all would comprehend it!

IP: Logged

lotusheartone
Knowflake

Posts: 238
From: MOther & Father GOd
Registered: Feb 2008

posted February 17, 2007 12:51 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for lotusheartone     Edit/Delete Message
I have a Scorpio Moon...opposite my Sun Taurus

with Libra as my ascending to balance them...

it's all about balance. ...

IP: Logged

Scorpionic Web
Knowflake

Posts: 513
From: Pennsylvania
Registered: Dec 2005

posted February 17, 2007 12:56 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Scorpionic Web     Edit/Delete Message
Lotus-
If "self exploration" (self knowledge) remains, then how can "self mastery" be declared?

IP: Logged

lotusheartone
Knowflake

Posts: 238
From: MOther & Father GOd
Registered: Feb 2008

posted February 17, 2007 12:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for lotusheartone     Edit/Delete Message
I did not use the word SELF, in my sentence...

IP: Logged

Scorpionic Web
Knowflake

Posts: 513
From: Pennsylvania
Registered: Dec 2005

posted February 17, 2007 01:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Scorpionic Web     Edit/Delete Message
Then what in the world are we referring to?!?!?

IP: Logged

lotusheartone
Knowflake

Posts: 238
From: MOther & Father GOd
Registered: Feb 2008

posted February 17, 2007 01:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for lotusheartone     Edit/Delete Message
you tell me???

IP: Logged

Scorpionic Web
Knowflake

Posts: 513
From: Pennsylvania
Registered: Dec 2005

posted February 17, 2007 01:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Scorpionic Web     Edit/Delete Message
I thought ALL OF THIS had to do with the "SELF"...

...you've lost me here.

What kind of knowledge are you talking about? Worldly knowledge, like the Genome Project, or how to select fine wine, or excavating Mayan ruins, or what?

Because, clearly, I was talking about the SELF in my use of the term "exploration", I don't know how you could've possibly interpreted my words as anything else.

IP: Logged


This topic is 11 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11 

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2007

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a