Lindaland
  Astrology 2.0
  Really, guys? Must you accentuate it? - Asteroids + Space. (Page 7)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 10 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Really, guys? Must you accentuate it? - Asteroids + Space.
DD
Knowflake

Posts: 7054
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 21, 2010 05:04 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for DD     Edit/Delete Message
"Where perception is absent, a word arises right on time."


(translation of a quote, taken from "Faust" by Goethe)

IP: Logged

Ami Anne
Moderator

Posts: 3013
From: Pluto/house next to NickiG
Registered: Sep 2010

posted November 21, 2010 05:05 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ami Anne     Edit/Delete Message
edit

IP: Logged

woah cakes
Knowflake

Posts: 253
From:
Registered: Oct 2010

posted November 21, 2010 05:32 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for woah cakes     Edit/Delete Message
[forget it.]

lindaland is losing its marbles.

IP: Logged

comica23
Knowflake

Posts: 1212
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 21, 2010 09:42 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for comica23     Edit/Delete Message
quote:
Relationships are complex.

Will I ever experience love at first sight again with anyone other than the man who has his Aphrodite conjunct my ASC and my Aphrodite conjunct his Moon.

No, I think not.


I guess that I'll just quote what I wrote in my last post about this:

quote:
That being said, each object represents a specific part of ourselves, that they can't be substituted by others (for example, having Moon-Moon compatibility doesn't give the romantic feelings a Valentine-AC conjunction gives, but Valentine-AC conjunction can't substitute the lack of Moon-Moon compatibility too - each aspect only shows what the objects symbolically represents).

Hmm I guess that to demonstrate what I was trying to explain, I'll use my own case as example.

Me and my bf have his Valentine conjunct my AC and some other romantic asteroid conjunctions/aspects, and I can see how these nice aspects are shown our relationship. But on the other hand, we lack of some personal planets compatibility (like Moon-Moon), and we do lack of some compatibility in those areas sometimes, despite the beautiful feelings related to the asteroids aspects.

I'm not saying that asteroids are not relevant - as I've mentioned before, I'm also interested in them, and I do use them frequently. What I was saying is that it's important to not to forget what each object - whether one of the main objects (planets, angles, etc.) or an asteroid - represents.

*edited again lol*

IP: Logged

iQ
Knowflake

Posts: 2389
From: Chennai, India
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 21, 2010 11:40 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for iQ     Edit/Delete Message
Comica,
Nobody is supposed to even begin checking the Asteroids in synastry until the basic filter of an Ascendant aspect and then a planetary harmony aspect is fulfilled. Once the basics are satisfied, then we look into the Asteroids for intricate information. The fear of Asteroids usually comes from a misunderstanding of how they work. The "Name Frequency" concept cannot be grasped by those who do not understand subtle planes of existence, and their interaction from the Unconscious to the Conscious Mind.

Take Nessus, the Centaur that makes a fool out of Asteroid skeptics by repeatedly proving its deadly effects. I have given more than 30 examples over the months in this forum itself about its damaging effect.
Afflicted Nessus exists in each and every serial killer's chart, and in a majority of sociopath's charts. The object's gravity cannot be a cause. So how does it work? How does the working of the Myth "download" from the Collective Unconscious into Physical Reality? Nobody is 100% sure, but it does happen. Like clockwork.

Pluto is too far too. How does it transform us? Pluto and Saturn will continue to make a fool out of Astrology skeptics, and Nessus, Karma, Eros, Fortuna, Valentine, Aphrodite etc will continue to confound Asteroid Skeptics as they blindfold through life not understanding these transits.

The Quran is more eloquent on knowledge deniers:
"Seeing they see not,
Hearing they hear not,
and neither will they understand".

Solomon was a tad harsh in Pslams so I will refrain from quoting the wise Sage.

Astrologers of the future will save girl's lives using Nessus aspects, and they will prevent the development of serial killers by counseling them during adolescence.

------------------
http://tamsoft.co.in/articles.html

Readings

IP: Logged

PlutoSquared
Moderator

Posts: 1479
From: Mars
Registered: Aug 2010

posted November 21, 2010 11:44 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for PlutoSquared     Edit/Delete Message
There is definitely truth to what iQ is saying. At first, I was skeptical, but now I totally understand and realize the "name frequency" idea... makes a lot of sense.

But, regardless, if one does not believe, just keep to your basics... no harm done.

IP: Logged

comica23
Knowflake

Posts: 1212
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 21, 2010 12:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for comica23     Edit/Delete Message
quote:
Nobody is supposed to even begin checking the Asteroids in synastry until the basic filter of an Ascendant aspect and then a planetary harmony aspect is fulfilled. Once the basics are satisfied, then we look into the Asteroids for intricate information.

But that's what I've been trying to say.

What I've been trying to express in my last posts:
- I'm also another asteroid user;
- Other elements (asteroids) don't cease to exist just coz some people (non asteroid believers) chooses to ignore their existence and stick to the basics (during interpretations);
- Both basic elements/objects (planets, angles, etc.) and asteroids can't substitute one another, and it's important to keep in mind what each element represent.


*edited* hmm the alien icon was chosen by mistake lol.

IP: Logged

Happy Dragon
unregistered
posted November 21, 2010 12:56 PM           Edit/Delete Message
( deleted .. on noting following post
( can enquire elsewhere ..

IP: Logged

The Duke
Knowflake

Posts: 510
From:
Registered: Nov 2009

posted November 21, 2010 01:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for The Duke     Edit/Delete Message

IP: Logged

amowls*
Knowflake

Posts: 1941
From: richmond va
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 21, 2010 02:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for amowls*     Edit/Delete Message
Ted Bundy does not have any significant Nessus aspects. His Nessus squares Saturn and Pluto. Seems dire indeed until you realize that everyone born that year has that aspect. It's also not placed angularly, nor does it aspect any personal planets.

Kate Middleton also has Nessus square Pluto and Saturn and I will be shocked if she turns into a serial killer.

IP: Logged

comica23
Knowflake

Posts: 1212
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 21, 2010 02:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for comica23     Edit/Delete Message
quote:
the reason you were able to find those charts is because of what the individuals did.. had they not done it, you would've never gotten a hold of their chart of birth date..

But then isn't it how researches are done normally (asteroids or not)? The point of this research is to study Nessus' effect in the chart of dangerous people, and for that, charts of dangerous people who committed dangerous acts are needed of course. Just like how astrologers who tries to figure what aspects between the basic charts elements that shows a certain effect in people's chart would do.

By the way, just wanted to add a curiosity regarding to asteroids research on dangerous people's chart. Why not everyone who has certain potentially dangerous aspects seem dangerous? The answer can actually be found through asteroid aspects in certain cases.

IP: Logged

The Duke
Knowflake

Posts: 510
From:
Registered: Nov 2009

posted November 21, 2010 02:56 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for The Duke     Edit/Delete Message

IP: Logged

DD
Knowflake

Posts: 7054
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 21, 2010 03:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DD     Edit/Delete Message
BTW planets are working on "name frequency", too.

So if it is invalid for asteroids, it is invalid for planets, too, which invalidates astrology in general.

IP: Logged

pire
Knowflake

Posts: 1533
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 21, 2010 03:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for pire     Edit/Delete Message
quote:
BTW planets are working on "name frequency", too.

before anyone invalidates astrology in general, can you elaborate please, or this statement is to be blindly accepted ?

IP: Logged

The Duke
Knowflake

Posts: 510
From:
Registered: Nov 2009

posted November 21, 2010 03:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for The Duke     Edit/Delete Message

IP: Logged

Benedict Moon*
Knowflake

Posts: 1662
From: Avendesora
Registered: May 2009

posted November 21, 2010 03:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Benedict Moon*     Edit/Delete Message
I only have one question about Nessus: do any of you really believe that its bad by default? Or like any other object, does it have two sides to it?

IP: Logged

amowls*
Knowflake

Posts: 1941
From: richmond va
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 21, 2010 03:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for amowls*     Edit/Delete Message
quote:
Why not everyone who has certain potentially dangerous aspects seem dangerous? The answer can actually be found through asteroid aspects in certain cases.

There are thousands of asteroids and they fall somewhere in people's charts. A few are bound to be considered significant. If you start looking for something, you're going to find it (especially with asteroids).

I think they're fun, but I prefer looking at the chart without them first.

IP: Logged

The Duke
Knowflake

Posts: 510
From:
Registered: Nov 2009

posted November 21, 2010 03:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for The Duke     Edit/Delete Message

IP: Logged

DD
Knowflake

Posts: 7054
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 21, 2010 03:23 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DD     Edit/Delete Message
What I mean is that the name of the planets (at least for the outer ones Uranus, Neptune, Pluto) are NOT based on a collection of experience and then applying the appropriate mythological name to them, but it was actually the other way round.
They gave it a name, for what reason ever, and with that name came the applied meaning, and afterwards it proved to have been the assumed effects.

Nothing else happens with asteroids.


And Pire (and some others writing here ont his thread,
you can spare us all your condescending tone, it`s annoying.

IP: Logged

The Duke
Knowflake

Posts: 510
From:
Registered: Nov 2009

posted November 21, 2010 03:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for The Duke     Edit/Delete Message

IP: Logged

DD
Knowflake

Posts: 7054
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 21, 2010 03:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DD     Edit/Delete Message
If you had lived in the 18th century, you would not have found that many written on Uranus in astrology either.

IP: Logged

DD
Knowflake

Posts: 7054
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 21, 2010 03:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DD     Edit/Delete Message
The Duke,

you just proved my point and didn`t even notice.

IP: Logged

The Duke
Knowflake

Posts: 510
From:
Registered: Nov 2009

posted November 21, 2010 03:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for The Duke     Edit/Delete Message

IP: Logged

comica23
Knowflake

Posts: 1212
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 21, 2010 03:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for comica23     Edit/Delete Message
quote:
BTW planets are working on "name frequency", too.

So if it is invalid for asteroids, it is invalid for planets, too, which invalidates astrology in general.



I agree. We attached meanings to planets' names, just like with asteroids, so if name frequency can't apply to asteroids, then it can't be applied to planets too.

Also, astrology is based on the theory "as above, so bellow", which means how things are up there affects how things are down here. So how can we accept the existence of some objects while not accepting the existence of others?

IP: Logged

The Duke
Knowflake

Posts: 510
From:
Registered: Nov 2009

posted November 21, 2010 03:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for The Duke     Edit/Delete Message
quote:
Venetia, can you tell us a little bit about the circumstances that happened in 1930 that brought you to suggest the name of Pluto?

Yes, I don’t quite know why I suggested it. I think it was on March the 14th, 1930 and I was having breakfast with my mother and my grandfather. And my grandfather read out at breakfast the great news and said he wondered what it would be called. And for some reason, I after a short pause, said, “Why not call it Pluto?” I did know, I was fairly familiar with Greek and Roman legends from various children’s books that I had read, and of course I did know about the solar system and the names the other planets have. And so I suppose I just thought that this was a name that hadn’t been used. And there it was. The rest was entirely my grandfather’s work.


IP: Logged


This topic is 10 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10 

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2010

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a