posted August 13, 2010 08:49 AM            

quote:

---

I didn't say anything about the debt in Alaska while Palin governed. Plenty of people apparently have. If you googled appropriately, you'd find them....acoustic

---

Why would I want to go find the lying comments of leftist moron haters of Sarah Palin?

Who cares what the leftist liars are saying and why would anyone want to clutter up their minds with their claptrap and drivel?

Oh, you didn't post this link...to the Alaska Public Debt...bearing Sarah Palin's name as Governor? http://www.revenue.state.ak.us/treasury/programs/documentviewer/viewer.aspx?428f

How odd acoustic. I thought you did. Oh wait, you did.

I know you were just trying to prop up katatonics post about how terrible things were in Alaska regarding debt when Palin was Governor.

Let's just call this "Another Palin Problem That Wasn't".

posted August 13, 2010 09:03 AM            

Rush Limbaugh on Democrats Wishing for Palin's Death
By Kelsey

Here's the video of the Rush Limbaugh segment Ian linked earlier:
http://www.conservatives4palin.com/

posted August 13, 2010 11:43 AM            

quote:

---

Yes, jwhop, I went to the source, which is what rational people do when they wish to investigate the legitimacy of claims.
...acoustic

---

Say acoustic, are you now saying you were trying to destroy katatonic's argument which attempted to link Alaska debt to Sarah Palin.

Thanks, you did an excellent job of that.

Gotta love those who get their news from comic strips...or parodies of journalists like Chris Matthews, Maddow, Olbermann and Cooper...or the "Puffers at Puffington Post".

posted August 13, 2010 05:13 PM            

Since Fox News is fair, balanced and accurate in reporting the news, I've started watching more often. Millions of other Americans have discovered the same thing and now, Fox News which is a cable news network is closing in on CBS..a broadcast news outlet.

State Rep. Resigns, Candidate Withdraws Over Palin Comments
Republicans Blast Democrats For Comments On Facebook
POSTED: 2:03 pm EDT August 12, 2010
UPDATED: 2:19 pm EDT August 13, 2010

DURHAM, N.H. --
Fallout over comments about Sarah Palin on Facebook has led to the resignation of a state representative and the withdrawal of a candidate.

Democratic candidate for state representative Keith Halloran announced Thursday afternoon that he was withdrawing from his race, a day after he came under fire for making a comment on Facebook related to Palin.

Halloran commented on the page of Republican Rep. D.J. Bettancourt, who posted about the death of former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens, who died Monday in a plane crash.

In response to the post, Halloran wrote, "Just wish Sarah and Levy (sic) were on board," referring to Palin and Levi Johnston, the father of her grandson.

Halloran at first called the criticism of his comment a "tempest in a tea party tea pot," but he later issued a statement on Facebook apologizing for the post. Thursday, he said he was withdrawing from the race for District 7.

"After consulting with the secretary of state's office, I am withdrawing as an active candidate for the New Hampshire House," Halloran said in a written statement. "I urge registered voters to consider supporting and voting for the truly progressive candidates on the ballot on Sept. 14 and Nov. 2. Live Free and Move Forward."

Also coming under fire for Palin-related comments on Facebook was Rep. Timothy Horrigan, D-Durham. Horrigan commented on Halloran's Facebook page in response to the controversy.

"(Well) a dead Palin wd be even more dangerous than a live one," Horrigan wrote. "(She) is all about her myth & if she was dead she cdn't commit any more gaffes."

State Democratic Party chairman Ray Buckley announced Thursday that Horrigan "took the appropriate action" by resigning.

posted August 15, 2010 08:38 AM            

Mr. President, should they or should they not build a mosque steps away from where radical Islamists killed 3000 people? Please tell us your position. We all know that they have the right to do it, but should they? And, no, this is not above your pay grade. If those who wish to build this Ground Zero mosque are sincerely interested in encouraging positive "cross-cultural engagement" and dialogue to show a moderate and tolerant face of Islam, then why haven't they recognized that the decision to build a mosque at this particular location is doing just the opposite? Mr. President, why aren't you encouraging the mosque developers to accept Governor Paterson's generous offer of assistance in finding a new location for the mosque on state land if they move it away from Ground Zero? Why haven't they jumped at this offer? Why are they apparently so set on building a mosque steps from what you have described, in agreement with me, as "hallowed ground"? I believe these are legitimate questions to ask.

posted August 16, 2010 11:03 AM              

there you go again speaking for "americans" like you know them all and/or what they want. what about the muslim americans who will use the mosque? have you vetted them? there are plenty of americans who are perfectly fine with that mosque. which as i already pointed out is not AT ground zero but two city blocks away. that's about half a mile and completely out of sight of ground zero.

but i guess "freedom" only applies to the right to not pay income tax or buy insurance. freedom of religion is not constitutional? freedom of assembly? and that good old freedom to use your money to buy any piece of real estate you can afford?

posted August 16, 2010 07:20 PM            

"By a dramatic margin, a majority of the country opposes the construction of the so-called "Ground Zero mosque," a new CNN poll finds. According to the new survey, 68% of Americans are against building the Cordoba House, a Muslim community center planned to be constructed two blocks from the former site of the World Trade Center. Twenty-nine percent favor the plan. "
http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/poll-68-of-americans-oppose-ground-zero-mosque.php

posted August 16, 2010 07:35 PM            

Americans believe it should not be built there.

posted August 16, 2010 07:43 PM            

"There had been mounting pressure for Obama to speak out on the issue after his political enemies, including former candidate for the vice presidency Sarah Palin, criticised the plan."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1303463/Obama-backtracks-G round-Zero-mosque.html

"WASHINGTON — The Senate's top Democrat says a mosque should not be built near the site of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

posted August 16, 2010 09:56 PM              

scapegoating is scapegoating and if the avowed purpose of 9/11 was to start a war between christianity and islam, wouldn't you say they have already won and this ruckus over a mosque half a mile from ground zero is just one more PROOF of that?

how far is far enough? san francisco?

i repeat what about the american muslims? are they all terrorists and radicals? you don't have to answer. but you will have a lot to answer for if you continue to support the vendetta being pushed in this country.

and why is the constitution to be ignored in this instance?

posted August 16, 2010 11:35 PM            

"America was an accomplice in 9/11 attacks"

This Imam says.....

"Osama bin Laden was "made in the USA"

This Imam say...

America should be more "Sharia compliant"

This Imam..

named the mosque Cordoba House...which has connotations of conquest.

This Imam is the same Imam who wants to build a mosque 2 blocks from the WTC site and this Imam's name is Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf.

This same Imam has been sent as an emissary to Muslim countries by Barack Hussein O'Bomber and the bill for this Imam's travel has been billed to American taxpayers.

I don't know anyone who is saying this Imam doesn't have the legal right to build the mosque on that site. But, I know a lot of people who think building on that site is a provocation and don't want it built there.

posted August 17, 2010 10:26 PM            

There has been push back (finally) from the more reasoned members of the GOP. The fringe dwellers are in fine deflectionary form with this one though.

I find it ironic that the people who hate and fear Muslims,
and are [seemingly] most offended
are usually the very first to wrap themselves in old glory. The very people who promote themselves as proactive defenders of the Constitution? It is expedient for the agenda to stoke the fires of hate and fear.