posted September 06, 2009 09:09 PM            

Get used to the idea of President Sarah Palin.

posted September 06, 2009 09:27 PM              

you didn't answer me. who said this?

"Real patriots get behind the Administration and Congress when the people have decided by election who is going to represent them and show a united front to enemies of America....whatever they may think privately."

do i have to give you the answer? because if you don't i will.

posted September 06, 2009 09:44 PM            

Funny though, you don't seem to understand the hypocrisy of using that statement when you and your friends...some here, some at the most radical organizations in America UTTERLY FAILED to get behind George W Bush when he was ELECTED TWICE to the Presidency of the United States.

posted September 06, 2009 11:27 PM            

But since you brought this subject up, this is your chance to prove it...right here. Go fish and find me saying anyplace on this site or elsewhere that those who do not get behind an elected administration are unpatriotic or traitors.

And good luck finding me saying the words..unpatriotic or traitors "in that context".

It goes without saying that those who give aid and comfort to enemies of the United States are traitors. That's the Constitutional definition of treason.

Singing from the terrorist hymnal, parroting their propaganda and attempting to throw a war to hang a war loss on the United States IS treason.

posted September 07, 2009 01:06 AM            

Post...right here..and in it's entirety, unedited, my comment whereby you allege I said "people who do not get behind an elected president are unpatriotic and/or traitors."

Oh yeah, one more thing.

posted September 07, 2009 03:15 AM            

Real patriots get behind the Administration and Congress when the people have decided by election who is going to represent them and show a united front to enemies of America....whatever they may think privately. - Jwhop May 02, 2006 http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum16/HTML/001915.html

posted September 07, 2009 11:11 AM            

What I actually said destroys your phony argument that I called Americans who protest their government..unpatriotic or traitors.

You...and everyone else will note there was a further context to what I said.

Further katatonic, what I said is FOUND IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

Now katatonic, it would come as no surprise to me that you either don't know what the US Constitution says or don't give a rats ass.

"Real patriots don't badmouth the military or the country or the administration during a time of war. That gives aid and comfort to the enemy as you and your band of fringe radical leftists have already done....some in the Congress of the United States.

Article 111 USC
Section 3.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.

Hey katatonic, up yours.

The protesters...at the time this was written were protesting on behalf of International A.N.S.W.E.R....a Communist front organization of the Communist Workers World Party...a Stalinist group which dotes on the brain dead little loony-tunes Dear Leader of North Korea...Kim Jong Il. They were protesting in favor of Saddam Hussein..to keep another little murdering, raping, torturing Socialist dictator in power...this, after the Congress of the United States passed the Joint Resolution authorizing military force to remove Saddam. Marching in the streets was a vote to keep their little Socialist dictator in power in Iraq. Apparently, for these brain dead morons, killing about a million Iraqi citizens wasn't enough. They wanted more Iraqi citizens raped, tortured or murdered.

How about you katatonic?

posted September 07, 2009 12:38 PM            

quote:

---

You...and everyone else will note there was a further context to what I said.

---

posted September 07, 2009 05:35 PM            

Fishing for the big ones, with ex Governor turned reality show host, Sarah Paling.

posted September 07, 2009 08:29 PM            

I know sufficiently to know Zeke is a nutcase who believes medical care should be rationed according to a persons "usefulness" to society.

That's enough to dismiss anything further Zeke the unethical phony ethicist has to say about much of anything. Being that far out of step with the traditions and values of America and Americans disqualifies Zeke from any position in government dealing with health care...or much of anything else.

posted September 07, 2009 08:46 PM            

quote:

---

I know sufficiently to know Zeke is a nutcase who believes medical care should be rationed according to a persons "usefulness" to society.

---

But you don't know that the context was within the scenario of having LIMITED availability of medical treatment, and THAT changes everything. If you're in a small village in some third world country, and you only have the means of saving a limited number of affected people, how do you decide on treatment? You can't treat everyone (like you can in America). Decisions have to be made. That's what he was writing about. That's where this rationing BS came from. It's completely out-of-context, and you should know that since you posted at least one of his papers here yourself.

posted September 08, 2009 12:03 AM            

forget all about telling me what I mean. I say exactly what I mean on almost all if not all occassions.

posted September 08, 2009 09:53 AM            

He said what he said, get used to it and live with the fact your immoral unethical little theorizing geek is a dead bang loser.

Zeke Emanuel bears a much closer policy resemblance to the Nazis Heinrich Himmler and Josef Mengele than anyone rational Americans would want to know.

Sarah Palin nailed Zeke. "Death Panel".

posted September 12, 2009 08:07 AM            

But, that's the immoral, unethical medical ethicist Zeke Emanual's flash of brilliance.

In the meantime, Sarah Palin continues to nuke O'Bomber and the immoral, unethical Zeke Emanuel.

posted September 13, 2009 03:36 AM            

quote:

---

You can't take....restricting or refusing health care cures, surgery or drug therapy to seniors, chronically ill or those who are judged...not useful to society..OUT OF CONTEXT acoustic.

---

You have and you did. I've already explained this to you. What part don't you understand about his rationing comments being in the context of limited medical resources? Do you really not get it?