|
Author
|
Topic: Prince William and Kate Middleton
|
Ami Anne
Moderator Posts: 53200
From: Pluto/house next to NickiG
Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted November 17, 2010 03:17 AM
  
Raspberri  Thank you for your words! ------------------
Pluto conjunct Dejanira, Girlfriend. IP: Logged |
Lara
Newflake Posts: 0
From:
Registered: Dec 2011
|
posted November 17, 2010 03:30 AM
Her family are not of wealth and it's v new money but that's not a biggie I don't think. Money means nothing in terms of status these days.Diana was v insecure and you can't say Charles cheated on her because she always knew he loved Camilla and Diana cheated several times on Charles!
Her image is pure and l admire the press for keeping it that way, if you know what I mean! IP: Logged |
Benedict Moon*
Knowflake Posts: 2791
From: Avendesora
Registered: May 2009
|
posted November 17, 2010 03:46 AM
They BOTH cheated, we know that for sure...because the marriage was a sham from the beginning. Ridiculous idea that it was solely her fault. She just didn't belong with such a family that is so concerned about a BS 'image' to protect. She was way too real for that. IP: Logged |
Lara
Newflake Posts: 0
From:
Registered: Dec 2011
|
posted November 17, 2010 03:52 AM
Well whatever, if you knew the facts then this conversation wouldn't need correcting  She had a bloodline and knew how to run a house. Sadly she was so determined to marry him that she did do just that and it ended up killing her. Such was her karma. She gave the country 2 kings, is not spoken ill of publicly so let's just leave it there.
It always amazes me how people can judge Diana perpetually with zero facts. I just don't understand what there is to gain by it. IP: Logged |
Benedict Moon*
Knowflake Posts: 2791
From: Avendesora
Registered: May 2009
|
posted November 17, 2010 04:03 AM
ZERO facts? I did a whole thesis on her in a British related class less than two years ago so I'd suggest you think again before you insult my intelligence this way. 
FACT #1: The marriage was arranged because she was elligible
FACT #2: Both cheated. FACT #3: She was terribly insecure to begin with, yes, and having THEM for in-laws made it alot worse. FACT #4: She was alot better off without them and it showed after her divorce You can't judge that she was an ambitious golddigger unless you personally knew her. Fact is she did alot of charity work and I personally judge more by that than whatever happened in her married life.
Now lets get back to astrology please instead of infecting this thread with your misogynistic tendencies.
IP: Logged |
Lara
Newflake Posts: 0
From:
Registered: Dec 2011
|
posted November 17, 2010 04:09 AM
LOL BMCalm down. Your thesis was based on public opinion and PRESS cuttings! How can that be FACT? Anyway, it's not personal - i'm not pointing the finger at you per se. Everyone whom reads a paper or listens to the news seems to think that they are right  The core of the Royal Family are nothing to speak badly of. In fact the Queen is a lovely, strong and personable woman who pretty much runs the world and is exceptionally powerful. You make it sound like they are either clueless or tyrants !! IP: Logged |
DD
Knowflake Posts: 7072
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 17, 2010 04:09 AM
As if we really knew ANYTHING about any of these people. (unless we actually knew them in real life)
We just know what we read about them, as we don`t know them personally, and what we think about them.IP: Logged |
Lara
Newflake Posts: 0
From:
Registered: Dec 2011
|
posted November 17, 2010 04:10 AM
hmmm IP: Logged |
Benedict Moon*
Knowflake Posts: 2791
From: Avendesora
Registered: May 2009
|
posted November 17, 2010 04:11 AM
Yes, Lara, I definitely went to tabloid cuttings to write a ten page paper I got an A+ on. Thanks again for reminding me why I cannot stand interacting with you.
And you are extremely contradictory aren't you? Because I recall you speaking not so nicely about the Queen not too long ago. Strange.
IP: Logged |
DD
Knowflake Posts: 7072
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 17, 2010 04:13 AM
BM,I am curious. What did you base your thesis on? IP: Logged |
Benedict Moon*
Knowflake Posts: 2791
From: Avendesora
Registered: May 2009
|
posted November 17, 2010 04:17 AM
There were various memoirs and biographies I found her. One of them was written by a close friend, actually....it was really sad. And I don't claim to know her, but I'm just irritated that when things get rough or scandalous, the woman is always at fault or the conniving biatch. Talk about some serious haterade. They both had issues, that we can all agree on. IP: Logged |
DD
Knowflake Posts: 7072
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 17, 2010 04:17 AM
Actually I would like to forget all the (still existing) background, and just look at their synastry as if they were anonymous.IP: Logged |
Lara
Newflake Posts: 0
From:
Registered: Dec 2011
|
posted November 17, 2010 04:19 AM
I don't speak badly of the Queen. If l do, it is only of being linked to the Illuminati and running America with one finger. Obama doesn't even sh1t without her giving permission!Anyway, like l said - it's not personal but the tabloids are 99% WRONG. The tabloids only write what they are allowed to write! i'm sorry if the truth offends you but it is the truth and l do know this. I'm sure you did do brilliantly on your thesis and because americans, bless there nylon trainer socks, don't know about English Heritage they wouldn't know the truth from not so it won't affect your thesis! I'm certainly not dissing you so no need to go on the offensive. The truth is the truth though, not just wishy washy tabloid gutter trash. IP: Logged |
Benedict Moon*
Knowflake Posts: 2791
From: Avendesora
Registered: May 2009
|
posted November 17, 2010 04:22 AM
Someone obviously failed to get my sarcasm. You don't diss, but you loooove stereotyping. I would think its more you who claims to know more than you actually do than the other way around. I, on the other hand, don't claim to know anything more than what I RESEARCHED....most of it written by BRITISH authors.
Anyways....back to astrology so I don't ruin this thread again: Kate looks arien in the face, and that would put her chart ruler in Libra. But I could be way off.
People always tend to become Venusian in front of the camera, but that's just my opinion. *I was a little bit concerned about him giving her DIANA'S ring, but I always forget that they've been going out with eachother for a very long time so maybe its not as big a pressure as we think it is. Although I'd be naive to say there was no pressure for them to get married. I'm not usually a fan of oppositions but her moon in cancer would work well with his sun and moon in cancer....and they have an interesting grand trine in air. IP: Logged |
Happy Dragon
unregistered
|
posted November 17, 2010 06:38 AM
" According to documents discovered by Dr Michael Jones in Rouen Cathedral there was a 5-week period when Richard was 100 miles away from his wife, leading a military campaign against the French, during which Henry was conceived, so Richard could not have been Henry's father, and so Henry's parents were not married at the time of his birth. Moreover, only one of Henry's parents (Cecily) was descended from Edward III and Henry II, and that line of descent was illegitimate (it was again via the union of John of Gaunt with Katharine). Thus Henry IV had no legitimate claim to the English throne, and so none of his descendants, including the present Queen of England, have had either. "( ~ http://www.serendipity.li/more/monarch.htm ~ ) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ " Aussie Mike the true King of England "
~ http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/aussie-mike-the-true-king-of-england/2005/09/10/1125772732666.html ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britain's_Real_Monarch ~ IP: Logged |
DiandraReborn25
unregistered
|
posted November 17, 2010 06:49 AM
im also inclined to her venusian nature.i dont know if it would give her a libra asc or taurus one..i have dimples,and its pretty strong,and i have libra asc..also i find her maneirism very similar to my own...i would say libra asc too. elegance,charm and a pleasant nature tells it all  IP: Logged |
DD
Knowflake Posts: 7072
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 17, 2010 07:02 AM
thanks, BM.IP: Logged |
Ami Anne
Moderator Posts: 53200
From: Pluto/house next to NickiG
Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted November 17, 2010 07:39 AM
If I had to guess ASC just from looks, I would say Virgo.
I have not seen her in clips, talking though so this is physical only,no mannerisms.
Virgo has a clean,pristine look to me that she has.
Belgz has that look to me. It is a delicate beauty in a way. It is hard to describe but it is different from Libra in that Libra can be so symmetrical that you "want" a feature to be out of place so the person will look more "human" and less cookie cutter.
Libra to me has a symmetrical look, first and foremost. Scorpio has a "dark" beauty like a goth is hiding inside Taurus has a rugged beauty like they could go out and wolf down a big meal Cancer has a rounded beauty. It reminds me of the old nude paintings of woman with the fat hanging down
Benedict looks like Cancer beauty minus the fat  Gemini has an impish beauty like they could get in to mischief at any second.
Amwols is my classic Gemini beauty.
------------------
Pluto conjunct Dejanira, Girlfriend.
IP: Logged |
Ami Anne
Moderator Posts: 53200
From: Pluto/house next to NickiG
Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted November 17, 2010 08:20 AM
I don't have a feel for Aries, Cap and Aqua.
Pisces looks other worldly like they are half living in another dimension.
Sag looks like they could go out and do a sport at any second. Princess Di was a Sag ASC.
They have an effortless,graceful feeling in how they move and carry themselves.Leo ASC looks like a lion,in some way. Jackie Kennedy or Farrah Fawcett like a Leo's to me.
They look dramatic and their entrance is like a Liberace sense lol ------------------
Pluto conjunct Dejanira, Girlfriend. IP: Logged |
Benedict Moon*
Knowflake Posts: 2791
From: Avendesora
Registered: May 2009
|
posted November 17, 2010 09:04 AM
She honestly looks more like an Aries to me...with some serious dimples. And I would say that could possibly put her sun in the 10th, but she didn't exactly become a public figure by her own means. Though transit-wise its a good candidate.But maybe Libra is nicer since that would put her moon, and William's Sun and Moon in her 10th house. Eh, who knows? Ascendants are too tricky to figure out.
quote:
Benedict looks like Cancer beauty minus the fat
Yep, that nice Saturn bone structure doesn't show up in me unless I'm under 130 lbs...LMAO.
IP: Logged |
iQ
Moderator Posts: 4658
From: Chennai, India
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 17, 2010 09:06 AM
William's Sun, Moon and Eclipse conjunct KAALI. This man rules the world in ways we can never imagine.The Human side of his personality surely loves Kate, else he would not tolerate her for 8 years when he can have any number of celebs for enjoyment at anytime in anyplace in any way he commands. Diana was "sacrificed" in an elaborate Illuminati ritual. Accidents reported to commoners = Ritual Sacrifice in the Illuminati. Now, the next "Pindar" hidden ruler of the world gifts the engagement ring of his sacrificed Mom to his bride to be
during the Arabic "Festival of Sacrifice" and during Sun square Neptune exact. Arabs based many of their religious rites on the Lunar pre-Islamic Cults from Babylon and The Moon = Mother astrologically. Does her bloodline have a "sacrificial component"? Is her Ascendant conjunct KAALI or REGULUS, is that her Natal Secret? I would love to get David Icke's expert opinions on this whole thing. IP: Logged |
Ami Anne
Moderator Posts: 53200
From: Pluto/house next to NickiG
Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted November 17, 2010 09:11 AM
Dear IQ
I "knew" Diana was killed. I read every biography and studied, just as a lay man, of course, but it seemed obvious.WHY was she killed? Was she upsetting the status quo like a wild card who could not be controlled? ------------------
Pluto conjunct Dejanira, Girlfriend. IP: Logged |
iQ
Moderator Posts: 4658
From: Chennai, India
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 17, 2010 09:23 AM
One theory was that she and Dodi had been pretending to be close, but then really decided to get cosy. An Arab Child from the same Womb that bore the Pindar? Even the vibes of this post will make Prince Philip shudder. David Icke flames the Queen but the real evil according to informed sources was the Queen Mother and Prince Philip. Queen Mother is likely to re-incarnate as Prince William's son or daughter in 2012.Another theory is that she knew too much about the Royal Family and was about to spill the beans. The Royal Family [and the Vatican Church, in a business partnership] owns America as their fiefdom. What will happen if Princess Diana revealed this to the common Americans? World War 3, between US Civilians and Anglo Saxon governments. It could ultimately be a simple case of Royal Jealousy. Prince Charles is after all a Scorpio. Would a Scorpio Man with his power and influence ever forgive an unfaithful wife? IP: Logged |
Ami Anne
Moderator Posts: 53200
From: Pluto/house next to NickiG
Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted November 17, 2010 09:28 AM
My "vibe" was that Diana and Dodi were a sham. I did not feel "it" between them like Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee ,for example  ------------------
Pluto conjunct Dejanira, Girlfriend. IP: Logged |
amowls*
Newflake Posts:
From:
Registered:
|
posted November 17, 2010 10:00 AM
Christ. The Crown does NOT own America nor does the Vatican... these are all conspiracy theories born out of xenophobia/anti monarchy.The same with "Jews + the Illuminati run the world" bs. That's all anti semitism. IP: Logged |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
